Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC
Size of Organization: 121 Year Established: 1869 Web Site: http://www.howardandhoward.com
Telephone: 248-645-1483
Fax: 248-645-1568
| |
Profile Visibility 
#338 in weekly profile views out of 263,071 total law firms Overall |
|
|
|
|
Founded in 1869, Howard & Howard is a full-service law firm with a national and international practice that provides specialized legal services to businesses and business owners. The firm has offices in Michigan (Ann Arbor and Royal Oak); Illinois (Chicago and Peoria); and Las Vegas, Nevada. We focus on providing value and core legal specialties to our clients that are crucial to modern business success. In turn, our growth and client attraction has come from our reputation for creativity, practicality and providing solutions in a cost-conscious environment. We are innovative in the fee arrangements and flexible billing structures we offer. We understand the relationship between fees and objectives, measuring our success by how much we improve a client's bottom line.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC:
Contracts (34 cases in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Total number of U.S. granted patents by Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC:
231 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC:
55
Client Review
Total number of Client Reviews for Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC:
2
Documents by Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC on Martindale.com
| |
Court Rejects Employee's Discrimination and Retaliation ClaimsMichael R. Lied, October 11, 2011
Martha Vance sued her employer, Ball State University, together with other defendants, for several employment related claims. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. On appeal, Vance pursued her hostile work environment and retaliation claims against Ball State based on...
The Unusual Case - Plaintiff Is Stuck With Defendant's Attorney's FeesMichael R. Lied, October 11, 2011
Bernadine Matthews worked for Wisconsin Energy Corporation (“WEC”) from 1980 to 1999. When she left WEC—it is not clear from the appellate opinion if this was an involuntary termination—the parties agreed how WEC would respond to reference requests from prospective employers.