Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

J. Phillip Bryant

Principal
Pitzer Snodgrass, P.C.
Deloitte, 100 South Fourth Street, Suite 400
St. Louis, Missouri 63102-1821
Peer Rating
4.9 of 5.0
Client Rating
N/R
AV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Civil Litigation; Products Liability; Transportation; Insurance; Professional Liability; Commercial Litigation
University
University of Missouri, Columbia, B.S., 1982
Law School
St. Louis University, J.D., 1998
Admitted
1999, Missouri, Illinois, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois
ISLN
914000684
Peer Reviews (36)
AV Rated
4.9/5.0
Peer Rating
 
High Ethical Standard
Civil Litigation, Products Liability, Insurance, Commercial Litigation, Defense Litigation, Personal Liability Defense, Insurance Coverage Defense, Personal Injury, Personal Injury Defense, Products Liability Defense, General Practice, Civil Practice and Insurance Litigation
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
4.9/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.8/5
Judgment
4.9/5
Communication Ability
4.9/5
Legal Experience
4.9/5
Peer Reviews (36)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/30/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/30/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/24/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/24/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/24/16
I have known Phillip for about five years, perhaps longer. He and I worked on a particularly complex and challenging personal injury case together several years ago. Phillip was always thoroughly prepared and had a very strong understanding of the law and facts of the case. I highly recommend Phillip.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/23/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/23/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate/Assistant General Counsel on 05/23/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/17/16
I serve on a CPCU national committee with Phil Bryant. We co-presented at a seminar we gave at the last annual meeting. His knowledge of insurance law and communication ability are excellent.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Other Law Firm Position on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 05/17/16
I am pleased to give Phillip the highest marks, and recommend him for your highest rating,
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 05/17/16
Phillip is an excellent litigator.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 05/17/16
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 09/26/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 09/18/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 09/10/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 09/10/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 03/24/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Senior Associate on 03/06/10
Phillip is a wonderful example of being a zealous advocate without attacking the attorney on the other side. He does not employ rambo-lawyering tactics, but rather logica, reasoning and persuasion.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 03/06/10
Phil is an excellent lawyer, and I respect his abilities.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 12/22/09
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 12/17/09
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/01/10
Fine upstanding Attorney with great adjusting experience prior to graduation from law school
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 12/01/09
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.4/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 04/05/10
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.2/5.0 Posted by a Judge on 02/26/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.2/5.0 Posted by a Judge on 11/30/09
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
3.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/06/10
Legal Knowledge
3.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
3.0/5
Judgment
3.0/5
Communication Ability
3.0/5
Legal Experience
3.0/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.