Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Sign In Contact Us
Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results





Practice Area Resource Centers

We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Bankruptcy; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation and more...

 






Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Jackson Lewis LLP Phoenix, AZ Document Search Results (4)

 

Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLEEOC’s Pre-Suit Obligation Failure Warrants Dismissal of 67 Claimants from Case, Court Rules
Richard S. Cohen, Paul A. Patten, Carrie L. Zochert; Jackson Lewis LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 2, 2012, previously published on February 28, 2012
In a highly-anticipated decision, a divided federal appeals court in St. Louis has affirmed the dismissal of 67 alleged “aggrieved individuals” from a hostile work environment lawsuit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against an interstate trucking company because...

 

HTMLJudge Tosses EEOC Pregnancy-Discrimination Class Action based on Work-Life Balance Theory, Echoing Themes from Dukes
Victoria Woodin Chavey, Richard S. Cohen, Paul A. Patten; Jackson Lewis LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 9, 2011, previously published on August 31, 2011
Granting an employer’s request for summary judgment, a federal judge in New York has ruled that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission failed to demonstrate that an employer engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination against pregnant employees or those who have returned from...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Reverses Certification of Nationwide Class of 1.5 Million Female Workers
William J. Anthony, Victoria Woodin Chavey, Richard S. Cohen, Pankit J. Doshi, Nicky Jatana, Paul A. Patten; Jackson Lewis LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 22, 2011, previously published on June 20, 2011
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected class action certification in “one of the most expansive class actions ever.” Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, No. 10-277 (June 20, 2011). The case involved allegations of gender discrimination in pay and promotion decisions in violation of Title VII of...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Determines Arizona’s Legal Arizona Workers Act Not Preempted by Federal Law
Amy J. Gittler, Sean G. Hanagan, Robert K. Jones, William J. Manning, Paul A. Patten, Jeffrey W. Toppel; Jackson Lewis LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 31, 2011, previously published on May 27, 2011
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected arguments that the controversial Legal Arizona Workers Act (“LAWA”) was preempted by federal law and would lead to discrimination by employers. Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Whiting, No. 09-115 (May 26, 2011). The Legal Arizona Workers...

 


Featured Services
About Us
LexisNexis© Digital Network
Follow Us

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright © 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.