- Family Law
- Custody and Visitation - Relocation with Minor Children
- Restraining Orders
- Civil Unions
- Dissolution of Civil Unions
- Family Law Arbitration
- Family Law Mediation
- Probate Law - Guardianships and Conservators
- Juvenile Court Law
- Criminal Defense
- DUI Defense
- Civil Litigation
- Landlord Tenant Law
- Trials, Contested Hearings, Negotiation, Mediation
- Collaborative Law Divorce Processes Available; Appeals
Central Connecticut State College, B.A., 1980
University of Bridgeport, J.D., 1985
1985, Connecticut and U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut; 1986, New Hampshire; 1996, U.S. Supreme Court
Litchfield County Collaborative Divorce Law Group; Waterbury, Litchfield County and Connecticut Bar Associations.
Westbury, New York, July 13, 1957
Phi Delta Phi. Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award for Property. Faculty Member, Family Section, Litchfield County and Waterbury Bar Associations' Symposium on Professionalism. Family Special Master: State of Connecticut, Regional Family Trial Docket; Litchfield Superior Court. Court Appointed Guardian ad Litem and Attorney for Minor Children, Litchfield Superior Court. Court Appointed Committee of Sale in Foreclosure and Partition Actions, Litchfield Superior Court.
The Nor'Easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc., 207 Conn. 468 (1988); Mayer v. Evans, 17 Conn. App. 807 (1988); Butts v. Meachum, 17 Conn. App. 826 (1989); Taylor v. Synergy Productions, 21 Conn. App. 661 (1990); Taff v. Bettcher, 243 Conn. 380 (1997); Benedict v. Betencourt, 252 Conn. 362 (2000); Zitnay v. Zitnay, 90 Conn. App. (2005).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com