James Mattesich has practiced law since 1972. Together with Gene Livingston, Jim founded Livingston & Mattesich in 1982 to represent clients in their interactions with the State of California, and was among the first attorneys in Sacramento to provide experienced and effective advocacy in all forums of public decision-making: legislation, regulation and litigation. Prior to his appointments to his state government positions, Jim litigated at all levels of the state and federal court systems, including the U.S. Supreme Court. He taught trial practice for the United States Legal Services Corporation.
He has combined his insider's knowledge of state government and his knowledge of the Legislature, state agencies, and the courts to the full advantage of his clients. Jim's multidimensional experience enables him to not only respond effectively to the current political and regulatory landscape, but to also anticipate new trends and changes that could affect his clients' goals.
Jim's legislative advocacy practice involves a broad range of regulatory and policy issues, and offers services unique to a lawyer-lobbyist. He combines his understanding of the statutory and administrative law relevant to the specific issue with his familiarity of how the legislature and the regulatory agencies actually work on behalf of each client. Jim can evaluate whether a regulation complies with the underlying law, court decisions and the administrative procedures for adopting regulations. If lobbying and administrative advocacy does not suit the client's specific needs, he can remedy legislative and regulatory problems in the courts.
Jim's clients include businesses and trade associations with significant interests in California. His work encompasses advising and representing clients in a wide range of regulatory, administrative and legislative matters. He counsels clients in the consumer products industries in regulatory compliance issues and legislative advocacy efforts. His practice encompasses environmental subspecialties, including toxic chemical regulation, air emissions standards, pesticide regulation, compliance and litigation regarding California's unique Proposition 65 statute, and regulatory and compliance matters before the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
Jim also handles matters involving professional licensing, including disciplinary and revocation hearings. Prior to founding Livingston & Mattesich, he held two key state government positions in California state government. Jim was appointed by the governor and confirmed by the state senate to serve as the first General Counsel and Deputy Director of the California Office of Administrative Law from 1980 to 1982. He and the first director, Gene Livingston, organized the newly established office charged with reviewing all state agency regulations. Jim hired and supervised a staff of 16 attorneys, and managed the review of every new regulation adopted by the 124 state agencies. Charged with evaluating the legality of the 13,000 pages of regulations proposed annually by the state, he worked with Gene Livingston to cut new regulations by 50%.
Prior to helping establish the Office of Administrative Law, Jim served as Deputy Director and Legal Counsel to the Director of the California Employment Development Department, an agency with 15,000 employees and a budget of $2.5 billion. He was responsible for drafting pleadings in major litigation, drafting state and federal legislative proposals as well as department regulations. He also represented the California Employment Development Department before the U.S. Congress and the California Legislature, as well as at administrative hearings, and in negotiations with the U.S. Department of Labor.
Areas of Concentration
•Legislative and regulatory advocacy
•Hazardous waste and toxic chemical laws
•Air emissions standards
•Alcoholic beverage control
Awards & Recognition
•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Government Relations Practice,2010-2015
•Team Member, a U.S. News - Best Lawyers Government Relations Law Firm of the Year, 2014
•Ranked, Tier 1 - Government Relations, Sacramento Metropolitan Area
•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Northern California Super Lawyers, 2004, 2006, 2012-2014
•Appointment, National Institute of Trial Advocacy
•Rated, AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5
AV, BV, AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies.
Articles, Publications, & Lectures
Articles•Co-Author, California Proposes Enhanced Prop. 65 Warnings and Possible Online Disclosures - Dietary Supplements and Foods Specially Targeted, Consumer Products Counselor, March 31, 2014
•Co-Author, California Proposes Enhanced Prop. 65 Warnings and Possible Online Disclosures - Dietary Supplements and Foods Specially Targeted, GT Alert, March 28, 2014
•Co-Author, California's OEHHA Adds New Chemical to Proposition 65 List, Setting up Product Manufacturers/Distributors as Targets to Eager Plaintiffs' Bar, GT Alert, January 14, 2014
•Co-Author, Food and Beverage Companies Face New Proposition 65 Threats Over 4-Methylimidazole (4-MEI), GT Alert, February 10, 2012
•Author, California Air Regulators Move Forward With Carbon Trading Program But Delay Enforcement Until 2013, GT Alert, July 6, 2011
•Author, New California 'Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking' Disclosure Obligations on Manufacturers and Retailers, GT Alert, November 8, 2010
•Co-Author, California Begins Nanomaterial Data Call-In, GT Sacramento Newsletter, January 2009
•Co-Author, California Begins Nanomaterial Data Call-In, GT Alert, December 2, 2008
•Author, New Landmark California Laws Establishing Regulatory Framework Regarding Green Chemistry for Consumer Products, GT Alert, October 14, 2008
•Co-Author, As Congress Contemplates Federal Action, States Continue to Aggressively Pursue Their Own Initiatives on Climate Change, GT Sacramento Newsletter, October 2008
•Author, As Congress Contemplates Federal Action, States Continue to Aggressively Pursue Their Own Initiatives on Climate Change, GT Alert, November 1, 2007
•Author, California Environmental Law Legislative Update: Good Year for Fluorescent Light Bulbs, Bad Year for Rubber Ducks, GT Alert, October 1, 2007
James lectures on regulatory compliance issues at numerous seminars and conferences sponsored by trade associations and business groups, including the Legal and Regulatory Conference as well as the Proposition 65 Clearinghouse Annual Conference.
Associated News & Events
Greenberg Traurig's Environmental Practice Receives Top Tier Rankings in U.S. News - Best Lawyers 2015 'Best Law Firms' List
23 Greenberg Traurig California Attorneys Recognized in the 2015 Best Lawyers in America
15 Greenberg Traurig Attorneys Included in 2014 Edition of Northern California Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
24 Greenberg Traurig California Attorneys Recognized in 2014 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
Ten Greenberg Traurig Attorneys Included in 2013 Edition of Northern California Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
26 Greenberg Traurig California Attorneys Included in 2013 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
Greenberg Traurig Attorneys Recognized in 2012 Edition of Northern California Super Lawyers
Greenberg Traurig Announces 22 Best Lawyers Throughout California
Life Sciences & Medical Technology Newsletter, Spring 2014
California Proposes Enhanced Prop. 65 Warnings and Possible Online Disclosures - Dietary Supplements and Foods Specially Targeted
California's OEHHA Adds New Chemical to Proposition 65 List, Setting up Product Manufacturers/Distributors as Targets to Eager Plaintiffs' Bar
Food and Beverage Companies Face New Proposition 65 Threats Over 4-Methylimidazole (4-MEI)
California Air Regulators Move Forward With Carbon Trading Program But Delay Enforcement Until 2013
New California 'Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking' Disclosure Obligations on Manufacturers and Retailers
Sacramento Quarterly Newsletter
California Begins Nanomaterial Data Call-In
New Landmark California Laws Establishing Regulatory Framework Regarding Green Chemistry for Consumer Products
As Congress Contemplates Federal Action, States Continue to Aggressively Pursue Their Own Initiatives on Climate Change