- Probate Law
- Trusts and Estates
- Estate Planning
- Asset Protection
- Real Estate
Beloit College, B.A., 1951
University of Michigan, J.D., 1954
1954, Colorado; U.S. District Court, District of Colorado and U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit
El Paso County, Colorado and American Bar Associations; Arbitration Panel, NASD Public Arbitration; Alternative Dispute Resolutions; National Arbitration Forum; NASD.
Denver, Colorado, February 17, 1930
Listed in: Top 50 Colorado Super Lawyers, 2006. Deputy District Attorney, 1957-1960.
Guevara v. Foxhaven, 928 P.2d 793 (Colo. App. 1996); Vallejo v. Eldridge, 764 P.2d 417 (Colo. App. 1988); Butcher v. Cordova, 728 P.2d 388 (Colo. App. 1986); State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Wangerin, 736 P.2d 1246 (Colo. App. 1986); Curry v. Industrial Commission, 672 P.2d 513 (Colo. 1983); Hawkins v. Dist. Ct., 638 P.2d 1372 (Colo. 1982); Churning v. Staples, 628 P.2d 180 (Colo. App. 1981); Bailey v. Clausen, 192 Colo. 297 (Colo. 1976) (557 P.2d 1207); Mitchell v. People, 173 Colo. 217 (Colo. 1970) (476 P.2d 1000); Bd. Barber Exam. v. White, 29 Colo. App. 471 (Colo. App. 1971) (485 P.2d 928); Mitchell v. People, 170 Colo. 117 (Colo. 1969) (459 P.2d 284); Int'l Serv. Ins. v. Ross, 169 Colo. 451 (Colo. 1969) (457 P.2d 917); Neher v. Dist. Court, 161 Colo. 445 (Colo. 1967) (422 P.2d 627); Smardo v. Huisenga, 159 Colo. 442 (Colo. 1966) (412 P.2d 431); Coy v. People, 158 Colo. 437 (Colo. 1965) (407 P.2d 345); Stoudt v. People, 156 Colo. 568 (Colo. 1965) (400 P.2d 670); Ager v. Adams, 155 Colo. 544 (Colo. 1964) (395 P.2d 735); Toland v. Strohl, 147 Colo. 577 (Colo. 1961) (364 P.2d 588).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com