|
 | John J. HareChair, Appellate Advocacy and Post-Trial Practice Group John J. Hare is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. He is a highly-experienced appellate attorney who serves as Chair of the firm's eight-attorney Appellate Advocacy & Post-Trial Practice Group. John's diverse practice includes cases involving professional malpractice, civil rights claims, product liability, toxic torts, construction accidents, employment claims, and premises liability.
Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin
1845 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103-4797
(Philadelphia Co.)
Telephone: 215-575-2609
Fax: 215-575-0856
http://www.marshalldennehey.com
|
Profile Visibility  | | #645 in weekly profile views out of 10,875 lawyers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | | #60,152 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Appellate Litigation; Post-Trial Practice | | | Education | Duquesne University, J.D., 1993, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, B.A., magna cum laude, 1990; University of California, Berkeley, M.A., Legal History; Princeton University, Ph.D., Legal History, 1999 | | | Admitted | 1994, Pennsylvania; U.S. District Court, Eastern, Middle and Western Districts of Pennsylvania and U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit | |
| Military | Lance Corporal, U.S. Marine Corps, 1986-1989 | | | Born | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | | | Biography | Listed in Pennsylvania Super Lawyer, 2009. Research Editor, 1992-1993 and Staff Member, 1991-1992, Duquesne Law Review. Law Clerk to the Honorable Patrick R. Tamilia, Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995-1997. Author: Note, "Freedom of the Press and the Right to a Fair Trial," 30 Duq. L. Rev. 760, 1992; "Keystone of Justice: The Pennsylvania Superior Court: 1895-1995"; "Appellate Review of Orders Compelling or Refusing Arbitration," Defense Digest, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2000-02. Co-Author, with Hon. Patrick R. Tamilia, "Superior Court of Pennsylvania," Pa. State Press, 2000; "Protecting Their Own; The Power Of Administrative Agencies To Enforce Regulations Through Litigation," Defense Digest, May 2003. Fellow: Philadelphia and Pennsylvania Bar Associations; Bar Association of the Third Federal Court. | | | Reported Cases | Toogood v. Rogal, 824 A.2d 1140 (Pa. 2003); Philadelphia Owners Association v. City of Philadelphia et al., 57 Fed. Appx. 961 (3d Cir. 2003); Laverdure v. County of Montgomery, 324 F.3d 123 (3d Cir. 2003); Johnson v. Vanguard Manufacturing, 34 Fed. Appx. 858 (3d Cir. 2003); O'Hara v. Randall, 879 A.2d 240 (Pa. Super. 2005); Connor v. Crozer Keystone Health Sys., 832 A.2d 1112 (Pa. Super. 2003); Stalsitz v. Allentown Hospital, 814 A.2d 766 (Pa. Super. 2004); Van Zandt v. Holy Redeemer Hospital, 806 A.2d 809 (Pa. 2002); Pakett v. The City of Philadelphia et al., 871 A.2d 304 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005); Seawright v. Greenberg, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9248 (3d Cir. 2007); Crystal Lake Camps v. Alford, 2007 PA SUPER 119 (Pa. Super. 2007); My Le Duong v. Nationwide Ins. Co., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27617 (3d Cir. 2006). | | | ISLN | 914385811 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Amendments to Recovery of Department Of Public Welfare LiensJohn J. Hare, February 13, 2009 Earlier this past November, the Pennsylvania Legislature significantly amended the rules relating to the reimbursement of Department of Public Welfare (DPW) liens for Medical Assistance (MA) payments from recoveries by or on behalf of MA recipients. |
|
|
RSS | Blog | Advertising Opportunities | Site Map | Contact Us
