John P. Stigi III: Lawyer with Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

John P. Stigi III


Peer Rating

Client Rating

Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & CredentialsOther Offices

Practice Areas

  • Litigation
  • Class Action Defense
  • Financial Institutions Litigation
  • Securities Enforcement
  • Securities Litigation
  • White Collar Defense and
  • Private Equity
  • Corporate Investigations
  • Aerospace and Defense
  • Digital Business
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Financial Services
University Columbia University, B.A., cum laude, 1984
Law SchoolUniversity of Virginia, J.D., 1987
Admitted1988, New York; 2000, California; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; U.S. District Courts for the Central District of California, Northern District of California, Southern District of California, District of Colorado, Eastern District of New York and Southern District of New York

•AIG Securities Litigation Panel Counsel, 2012-present
•American Bar Association, 1989-present
•New York State Bar Association, Civil Practice Law and Rules Committee, 1996-1999
•Los Angeles World Affairs Council, 2006-2009
•University of Virginia School of Law National Litigation Panel, 1996-2000
•Columbia University Alumni Representative Committee, Regional Co-Chair, 2007-present



John Stigi is a partner in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm's Century City and Palo Alto offices, and co-leader of the firm's Corporate/Securities Litigation Team.

Areas of Practice

Mr. Stigi's practice focuses on securities class action and shareholder derivative action defense, SEC investigation defense, internal corporate investigations, complex contract and commercial litigation, and M&A and corporate governance litigation. He has extensive experience representing issuers, officers, directors and auditors in all areas of securities, corporate and complex commercial litigation, from the early stages before a complaint is filed through pleading motions, discovery, mediation, trial and appeal. Mr. Stigi also advises companies on disclosure and corporate governance issues, as well as directors and officers insurance matters.

Mr. Stigi’s practice is national in scope. He appears in federal and state courts throughout California, New York and Delaware, and also has appeared in courts in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, Texas and Washington. Mr. Stigi is a member of the AIG Securities Litigation Panel (class action approved).

Mr. Stigi previously practiced in Silicon Valley and New York City where he represented issuers, accountants, banks, brokerage firms, and hedge fund managers in securities, commercial, bankruptcy, employment, and real estate litigation. Mr. Stigi clerked at the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and was an executive editor of the Virginia Journal of International Law.

•Southern California Super Lawyer, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014
•Northern California Super Lawyer, 2005


Representative Cases

Securities & Shareholder Derivative Actions

•Advanced Cell Technologies
•America West
•Arthur Andersen
•Bolar/Circa Pharmaceuticals
•Chordiant Software
•Digital Cornerstone
•Ernst & Young
•Fairchild Corporation
•First Virtual Communications
•GEM Services, Inc.
•Hewlett Packard
•i2 Technologies
•International Rectifier
•Irvine Sensors
•Jennifer Convertibles
•LBI Media Holdings
•Leap Wireless
•National Technical Systems
•NCI Building Systems
•NorthPoint Communications
•Redback Networks
•Sahlen & Associates

M&A/Going Private Actions

•CrossWorlds Software
•Hewlett Packard/Compaq
•Hewlett Packard/Walter Hewlett
•Imperial Capital
•International Rectifier
•Lions Gate Entertainment
•Med BioGene
•National Technical Systems
•Parametric Sound
•Physicians Formula
•Plumtree Software
•Rational Software
•Raytel Medical
•Rizvi Traverse/Playboy
•Sport Chalet
•Taylor Made/Adams
•Taylor Made/Ashworth

Financial Services-Related Actions

•B. Riley
•CIBC Oppenheimer
•Citicorp Real Estate
•Clearwater Fund
•European American Bank
•First Nationwide Bank
•Hambro America
•Imperial Capital
•Liberty Brokerage
•Moore Capital Management
•Patriot Securities

Publications & News

•3rd Circ. Eases Limitations Test For Securities Claims, Law360, October 25, 2013
•Case Study: In Re Boston Scientific, Law360, August 6, 2012
•Addressing Materiality At The Pleadings Stage, Law360, September 7, 2011
•Barring RICO Claims Based On Alleged Securities Fraud, Law360, July 28, 2011
•Courts Interpret 'Tellabs', The National Law Journal, March 17, 2008
•May a Court Consider Competing Inferences of a Defendant's State of Mind in Determining Whether the Complaint Pleads a 'Strong Inference' of Scienter? 34 Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases (ABA), No. 6, April 9, 2007
•Electronic Discovery: New Rules Also Affect E-Discovery of Nonparties, The National Law Journal, March 19, 2007
•Delaware Decision in Disney Sets Forth Parameters for Duty of Good Faith, 21 Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter, No. 6, September 25, 2006
Disney Case Provides Further Insight into Directors' Duty of Disclosure, 13 Corporate Governance Advisor, No. 5, September/October 2005
•Delaware Vice Chancellor Strine Suggests Reform of Delaware Common Law Regarding Fully Negotiable Going-Private Transactions, 9 Wall Street Lawyer, No. 3, August 2005

Corporate & Securities Law Blog Posts

•Second Circuit Clarifies that Allegations of Direct Fraudulent Representations Are Not Necessary for Market Manipulation Claims Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, February 11, 2015
•Second Circuit Notes Split with Ninth Circuit Over Whether Failure to Make Adequate Disclosures Under Item 303 of Regulation S-K May Serve as Basis for a Section 10(b) Claim, January 26, 2015
•Delaware Supreme Court Confirms Chancery Court’s Broad Authority to Impose Use Restrictions on Information Obtained From Section 220 Books and Records Inspections, January 5, 2015
•Ninth Circuit Holds that Under Nevada Law, a Prior Stockholder’s Litigation of Demand Futility Precludes Another Stockholder From Litigating Demand Futility In a Subsequent Derivative Action, January 5, 2015
•California Court of Appeal Applies Delaware Law to Deny Discovery in Shareholder Derivative Action, December 23, 2014
•Delaware Court of Chancery Rejects Contemporaneous Ownership Requirement For Creditors Asserting Derivative Claims, October 27, 2014
•Sixth Circuit Narrows Scope of Liability Under ICA Sections 36(a) and (b), October 8, 2014
•U.S. Supreme Court Decision Gives More Latitude to Defeat Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuits Prior to Class Certification, June 25, 2014
•Delaware Court of Chancery Underscores Heightened Pleading Standard Necessary to Support a Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty In Connection With a Merger, May 12, 2014
•Fourth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Securities Fraud Complaint Where Inference of Scienter Was Not Sufficiently Strong, April 18, 2014
•District Court Cites Recent “Evolution” of Rule 23 Standards to Deny Class Certification Motion in Securities Action Based Upon Allegedly Misleading Registration Statement, April 1, 2014
•United States Supreme Court Holds That Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Extends to Employees of Private Companies Who Are Contractors or Subcontractors for Covered Public Companies, March 12, 2014
•Delaware Court of Chancery Grants Summary Judgment Dismissing Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims In Absence of Evidence of Directors’ “Conscious Disregard” of Fiduciary Duties, March 12, 2014
•Tenth Circuit Looks Past 'General Partnership' Labels in Agreements to Determine Whether Certain Investments Constitute 'Securities', March 10, 2014
•United States Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split and Narrows Scope of SLUSA, March 6, 2014
•Delaware Chancery Court Declines to Apply Offer-of-Judgment Rule in Appraisal Proceedings, February 25, 2014
•Delaware Court of Chancery Applies Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing to Prohibit An Acquiring Entity From Diverting Revenues to Depress Payouts Under a Contingent Purchase Price Provision, February 20, 2014
•Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Short-Swing Profit Claim Against Goldman Sachs Arising from Six-Month Call Options, February 4, 2014
•Second Circuit Holds Delaware Fiduciary Duty Law Preempted By Federal Interest In Fiscal Stability, February 4, 2014
•Delaware Supreme Court Holds That a Minority Stockholder Has No Common Law Right to a Conflict-Free Board Decision Regarding the Repurchase of Shares, January 30, 2014
•United States Supreme Court Holds That Non-U.S. Corporations Are Subject to General Personal Jurisdiction in U.S. States Only in States Where They Are 'At Home,' January 28, 2014
•California Court of Appeal Clarifies Rights of Dissenting Minority Shareholders Under California Corporation Code 1312(b), January 16, 2014
•Delaware Supreme Court Holds Receiver is Required to Defend Lawsuits After a Corporation is Wound-Up; Finds No Generally Applicable Statute of Limitation for Claims Against a Dissolved Corporation, December 11, 2013
•United States Supreme Court Holds that Contractual Forum-Selection Clauses Deserve Near Absolute Deference In Considering Changes of Venue Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), December 11, 2013
•California Court of Appeal Holds That Challenges to Corporate Elections Under Corporations Code Section 709 May be Predicated Upon Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conflict of Interest Allegations, November 6, 2013
•Second Circuit Applies Morrison to Criminal Prosecution Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, October 23, 2013
•Second Circuit Clarifies Scope of SLUSA Preclusion, October 21, 2013
•Tenth Circuit Finds that Jury Must Determine Whether “Notes Are Securities” in a Securities Fraud Action, October 21, 2013
•Ninth Circuit Vacates Dismissal and Remands Shareholder Derivative Say-on-Pay Suits to California State Court, August 26, 2013
•Eighth Circuit Applies Negligence Standard to SEC Enforcement Claims for Violations of Section 14(a) and Rules 14a-9, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2, August 26, 2013
•Second Circuit Rejects the Application of American Pipe's Tolling Rule and Rule 15(c)'s Relation Back Doctrine to the Three-Year Statute of Repose for Section 11 and 12(a) Claims, July 16, 2013
•Delaware Court of Chancery Upheld Enforceability of Bylaws with Forum Selection Clauses Unilaterally Adopted by Board of Directors, July 16, 2013
•Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Suits Brought by Madoff Trustee Against Banks Accused of Aiding Madoff Fraud, July 2, 2013
•Second Circuit Reaffirms Continued Use of the Knowing Possession Causation Standard in Rajaratnam Insider Trading Case, June 28, 2013
•Delaware Chancery Court Establishes Procedural Framework for Obtaining Business Judgment Review for Going Private Transaction Sponsored By Majority Stockholders, June 25, 2013
•Fifth Circuit Holds That Securities Fraud Defendants May Not Rebut the Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption at the Class Certification Stage Through Evidence of No Price Impact, June 21, 2013
•Sixth Circuit Splits with Second and Ninth Circuits Regarding Need to Allege Defendants' State of Mind for Claims Challenging Soft Information Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, June 12, 2013
•Second Circuit Holds that Allegations of Direct Fraudulent Representations Are Necessary for Market Manipulation Claims Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, May 24, 2013
•Ninth Circuit Holds that Federal Securities Laws Preempt California Labor Code's Ban on Forced Patronage at Brokerage Firms, May 9, 2013
•United States Supreme Court Decides Question of Corporate Liability Under Alien Tort Statute On Broader Grounds, April 25, 2013
•Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Preclusive Effect of Non-Delaware Dismissals and Rejects Irrebuttable Presumption That a Derivative Plaintiff Who Fails to Conduct a Section 220 Inspection Is an Inadequate Representative, April 23, 2013
•Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Securities Fraud Class Action, Remanding Question of Sanctions Against Plaintiffs' Counsel, April 9, 2013
•Second Circuit Reverses Class Certification Order, Holding That a Clearing Broker's Alleged Knowledge of Fraud Against Shareholders, Absence Direct Involvement, Is Insufficient to Create a Duty of Disclosure, March 27, 2013
•Second Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Section 11 and 12(a)(2) Claims, Holding that Plaintiff's Allegations Were Sufficient to Plead a Reasonable Inference of Misrepresentations in a Prospectus, March 11, 2013
•Third Circuit Reinforces Limits to Directors' Exposure for Misconduct by Corporate Employees, March 7, 2013
•United States Supreme Court Holds that Class Action Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Need Not Prove the Materiality of the Alleged False Statements or Omissions to Support Certification of a Class, Resolving Circuit Split, March 7, 2013
•United States Supreme Court Declines to Apply the Discovery Rule to Extend the Five-Year Statute of Limitations for SEC Punitive Fraud Enforcement Actions, March 6, 2013
•California Supreme Court Resolves Court of Appeal Split, Holding that Section 2010 of the California Corporations Code -- California's Survival Statute -- Does Not Apply to Foreign Corporations, February 27, 2013
•California Court of Appeal Recognizes That Wide Discretion Granted to a Board of Directors Under the Business Judgment Rule May Be Tempered By a Corporation's Private Contractual Obligations to Its Shareholders/Members, February 15, 2013
•Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Securities Fraud Claims Relating to Allegedly Misleading Press Release, February 15, 2013
•Ninth Circuit Applies Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act to Affirm Dismissal of Section 17200 Class Action Involving Variable Life Insurance Policies, January 31, 2013
•The Second Circuit Finds No Section 16(b) Violation Where Different Securities of the Same Issuer Are Bought and Sold, January 10, 2013
•Ninth Circuit Applies Heightened Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standard to Allegations of Tracing in a Section 11 Claim, January 8, 2013
•Ninth Circuit Reiterates that District Courts Must Analyze Allegations of Scienter Holistically In Determining Whether a Plaintiff Has Adequately Pleaded Securities Fraud Claims, January 8, 2013
•Delaware Has No Per Se Rule Against Don't Ask, Don't Waive Standstill Provisions, But Boards Must be Careful in Using Them,January 4, 2013
•Delaware Chancery Court Holds That a Stockholder Inadequately Represents a Corporation in Derivative Litigation When He or She Files a Caremark Claim Without First Making a Section 220 Books and Records Demand, November 14, 2012
•Delaware Chancery Court Rejects Stockholder's Section 220 Books and Records Demand Based Upon Failure to Demonstrate Credible Basis for Inspection, November 14, 2012
•Ninth Circuit Holds that Allegations a Defendant Should Have Used a Different Statistical Methodology During Drug Trials is not Sufficient to Allege Falsity Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, September 25, 2012
•New York Appellate Court Adopts Delaware Supreme Court's Tooley Test For Determining Whether a Stockholder's Claim Is Direct or Derivative, August 22, 2012
•Second Circuit Holds That SEC Need Not Prove Proximate Cause for Aiders and Abettors Under Section 20(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, August 15, 2012
•First Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Securities Fraud Action Based Upon Immateriality of Allegedly Omitted Information, July 27, 2012
•California Federal District Court Holds That Section 1312(a) of the California Corporations Code Provides the Exclusive Remedy For Minority Shareholders Seeking to Challenge a Proposed Merger, July 18, 2012
•Eleventh Circuit Reverses In Part Securities Fraud Judgment Against Clearing Broker in an Action Brought by the SEC, June 18, 2012
•Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Securities Class Action Against CBS Due to Plaintiffs' Failure to Plead Scienter and Reliance, May 25, 2012
•SEC Staff Issues Report on the Cross-Border Scope of Private Rights of Action for Securities Fraud, May 9, 2012
•Second Circuit Effectively Reverses Rejection of SEC's Settlement with Citigroup, March 30, 2012
•Fifth Circuit Requires More than Tangential Relationship Between Alleged Fraud and Transactions in Covered Securities to Support Dismissal Under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998, March 30, 2012
•Delaware Chancery Court Clarifies When Corporate Officers and Directors are Entitled to Mandatory Indemnification Under DGCL 145, March 19, 2012
•Second Circuit Clarifies Meaning of Domestic Transactions As Used In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, March 12, 2012
•First Circuit Holds That Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Extends Only to Employees of Public Companies, Not Employees of Private Companies Who Are Contractors or Subcontractors for Covered Public Companies, February 15, 2012
•Foreign Corporation's Mere Awareness That Its Products May Ultimately End Up In a Forum State Is Not Sufficient Contact to Support Personal Jurisdiction, January 12, 2012

New York Commercial Division Round Up Blog Posts (Also at Palo Alto Office)


Documents by this lawyer on

Subscribe to this feed

Delaware Court of Chancery Rejects Share-Tracing Standing Requirement for Appraisal Petitioners
Alex Kuljis,John P. Stigi, February 25, 2015
The Delaware Court of Chancery issued companion opinions clarifying Delaware’s standing requirements for appraisal petitions under 8 Del. C. § 262. In In re Appraisal of, Inc., C.A. No. 8173-VGC, 2015 WL 66825 (Del. Ch. Jan. 5, 2015), and Merion Capital LP v. BMC Software,...

Second Circuit Clarifies that Allegations of Direct Fraudulent Representations Are Not Necessary for Market Manipulation Claims Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5
Tyler E. Baker,Manuel F. Gomez,John P. Stigi, February 24, 2015
In Fezzani v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., No. 14-3983, 2015 WL 400547 (2d Cir. Jan. 30, 2015) (“Fezzani II”), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit clarified its opinion in Fezzani v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., 716 F.3d 18 (2d Cir. 2013) (“Fezzani...

California Court of Appeal Applies Delaware Law to Deny Discovery in Shareholder Derivative Action
Madalyn Macarr,John P. Stigi, January 16, 2015
In Jones v. Martinez, 230 Cal. App. 4th 1248 (2014), the California Court of Appeal, Second Division, held that a plaintiff asserting a shareholder derivative action against directors of a Delaware corporation in a California state court may not obtain discovery before the plaintiff establishes...

Profile Visibility
#2,238 in weekly profile views out of 32,364 lawyers in Los Angeles, California
#116,095 in weekly profile views out of 1,673,393 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

John P. Stigi III

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600
Los AngelesCA 90067


Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now