Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

John Tarley, Jr.

Managing Partner
Tarley Robinson, P.L.C.
4808 Courthouse Street, Suite 102
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
Peer Rating
4.6 of 5.0
Client Rating
5.0 of 5.0
AV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Construction Law; Real Estate; Homeowners Association Litigation; Commercial Litigation; Creditors Rights; Corporate Law; Civil Litigation
University
Pennsylvania State University, B.S., 1982; Pennsylvania State University, M.B.A., 1983
Law School
College of William & Mary, Marshall-Wythe School of Law, J.D., 1992
Admitted
1992, Virginia; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia; U.S. Bankruptcy Court
ISLN
901059497
Peer Reviews (22)
AV Rated
4.6/5.0
Peer Rating
 
High Ethical Standard
General Practice, Civil Litigation, Community Association Law, Receivership, Contract Litigation, Complex Litigation, Civil Practice, Commercial Litigation, Litigation and Real Estate
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
4.5/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.5/5
Judgment
4.6/5
Communication Ability
4.5/5
Legal Experience
4.6/5
Peer Reviews (22)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Government Counsel on 08/17/12
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 08/06/12
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 08/04/12
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Judge on 11/11/10
AS an appellate judge, my professional contact is limited. My response is based on his professional reputation in the community and knowledge of his work. He teaches in the Legal Skills Program at the William & Mary Law School and was named the St. George Tucker Professor.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 11/05/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 10/28/10
John is a great attorney worthy of the highest praise for his legal knowledge, skill and ability to work well with others.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 10/28/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 10/20/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Government Counsel on 10/20/10
John is a consumate professional. I've litigated with and against him. In addition, John is active in the community and takes responsible postition in professional organizations.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 10/20/10
I have worked with John most recently where he and I were counsel for co-defendants against a very irrational plaintiff (and Plauntiff's Attorney). John was very professional and demonstrated excellent judgment and ability.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Senior Associate on 08/12/12
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 10/20/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 11/05/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 10/20/10
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.4/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 08/04/12
Great lawyer and very pleasant to work with
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.4/5.0 Posted by a Of Counsel on 10/20/10
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.2/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 08/05/12
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 11/23/10
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
3.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 10/21/10
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 10/20/10
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
3.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 08/06/12
Legal Knowledge
3.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
3.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 10/20/10
Legal Knowledge
3.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
3.0/5
Judgment
3.0/5
Communication Ability
3.0/5
Legal Experience
3.0/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Client Reviews

Overall Client Rating

in Construction Law, Real Estate and Homeowners Association Litigation
5.0 out of 5.0
Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client(s)
  • Last reviewed on 06/29/12
Posted by a on 06/29/12
5.0 out of 5.0  
John did a wonderful job representing us in the lawsuit filed against us. He is a skilled lawyer and a wonderful person. I enthusiastically recommend him to anyone.
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.