Johnson & Bell, Ltd.
Size of Organization: 114
Year Established: 1975Web Site: http://www.johnsonandbell.com
|Profile Visibility |
#250 in weekly profile views out of 283,509 total law firms Overall
For more than 35 years, Johnson & Bell, Ltd.'s trial attorneys have offered premier defense representation throughout the Midwest and nationally. Founded in 1975, Johnson & Bell made its mark through landmark class-action cases such as the Beverly Hills Supper Club fire and the Bogalusa chemical spill. It's tried nearly 90% of the major catastrophic cases in the Chicago land area, and achieved numerous favorable verdicts for its clients in categories including health care, toxic tort, insurance and business litigation.
While Johnson & Bell's attorneys try among the most cases in Chicago's Cook County, the firm believes many legal difficulties can be avoided through risk-reduction measures and careful compliance with the law. Hence, our attorneys provide regular legal updates notifying clients of legislative and regulatory changes as they happen.
Johnson & Bell continually receives national recognition for its trial and appellate advocacy: American Lawyer's Corporate Counsel Magazine named the firm as one of the Top 100 Law Firms in client satisfaction and Martindale-Hubbell has awarded more than 30 of the firm's shareholders its top mark, an AV-rating. ALFA International, a global legal network, named it 2011 Firm of the Year. These, and countless other accolades, illustrate Johnson & Bell's quest to serve its clients.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Johnson & Bell, Ltd.:
Documents by Johnson & Bell, Ltd. on Martindale.com
The Charging Party Will See What You Are Saying
Robert J. Dignam, April 26, 2016
Employers should be aware that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has implemented a new nationwide procedure concerning the disclosure of a Respondent’s position statement to a Charging Party. For all position statements filed on or after January 1, 2016, in...
District Court Rejects Title IX Restroom Access Claim of Transgender Student
Joseph F. Spitzzeri, November 13, 2015
How schools treat transgender students as it relates to the use of restrooms and locker rooms has become a hotly debated issue throughout the country. In one of the first published federal court rulings on this issue, the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has dismissed a...