Johnson & Bell, Ltd.
Size of Organization: 114
Year Established: 1975Web Site: http://www.johnsonandbell.com
|Profile Visibility |
#1,259 in weekly profile views out of 280,124 total law firms Overall
For more than 35 years, Johnson & Bell, Ltd.'s trial attorneys have offered premier defense representation throughout the Midwest and nationally. Founded in 1975, Johnson & Bell made its mark through landmark class-action cases such as the Beverly Hills Supper Club fire and the Bogalusa chemical spill. It's tried nearly 90% of the major catastrophic cases in the Chicago land area, and achieved numerous favorable verdicts for its clients in categories including health care, toxic tort, insurance and business litigation.
While Johnson & Bell's attorneys try among the most cases in Chicago's Cook County, the firm believes many legal difficulties can be avoided through risk-reduction measures and careful compliance with the law. Hence, our attorneys provide regular legal updates notifying clients of legislative and regulatory changes as they happen.
Johnson & Bell continually receives national recognition for its trial and appellate advocacy: American Lawyer's Corporate Counsel Magazine named the firm as one of the Top 100 Law Firms in client satisfaction and Martindale-Hubbell has awarded more than 30 of the firm's shareholders its top mark, an AV-rating. ALFA International, a global legal network, named it 2011 Firm of the Year. These, and countless other accolades, illustrate Johnson & Bell's quest to serve its clients.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Johnson & Bell, Ltd.:
Documents by Johnson & Bell, Ltd. on Martindale.com
Employer Pre-Medical Treatment Notice Policies Called Into Question
Joseph F. Spitzzeri, November 13, 2014
As of January 2011, FedEx had a company policy that required immediate reporting of workplace injuries whether they required only minor first aid or professional medical treatment. In addition, the FedEx policy required that employees wishing to seek professional medical treatment for a workplace...
Debt Collectors Beware: Venue Provision of FDCPA Reinterpreted
Brian C. Langs,Joseph R. Marconi, October 8, 2014
In Suesz v. Med-1 Solutions, LLC, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12562 (7th Cir. 2014), the Seventh Circuit recently reinterpreted the venue provision of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). The issue for the court was whether township small claims courts in Marion County,...