Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C.

 – Firm Profile
 




Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C. Law Firm Logo

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C. 

Size of Organization: 70
Year Established: 1983
Main Office: Phoenix, Arizona
Web Site: http://www.jshfirm.com

Telephone: 602-263-1700
Fax: 602-651-7599



Profile Visibility
#418 in weekly profile views out of 281,375 total law firms Overall


Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C. began in 1983 with 12 lawyers. We have over 70 lawyers and are the largest and most experienced law firm in the state specializing in trial practice; insurance/insurance coverage; defense of corporations; self-insureds; municipalities and insurance carriers. Twelve lawyers are members of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) recognizing superior litigation experience. Four of our lawyers are Fellows in the American College of Trial Lawyers (ACTL), the premier trial college in America. Many of our lawyers are "super lawyers" and we are recognized as the largest and most experienced insurance defense trial firm in Arizona.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C.:
Insurance (55 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C.: 30
Client Review

Total number of Client Reviews for Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C.: 2


Documents by Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C. on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Merkens v. Federal
Eileen Dennis GilBride, July 16, 2015
Injured Worker Who Failed To Challenge Termination Of Workers’ Comp Benefits In Industrial Commission Cannot Bring Bad Faith Claim

State v. Bernstein
Eileen Dennis GilBride, July 16, 2015
Eleven defendants charged with aggravated driving under the influence had their blood tested by the Scottsdale Crime Laboratory. Defendants moved to exclude the evidence of their blood alcohol (BAC) results under Rule 702, arguing that the instrument used to measure BAC had unresolved flaws that...

Lee v. M&H, Wal-Mart
Eileen Dennis GilBride, July 16, 2015
Court Rejects Lent Employee's Claim Against Special Employer After Employee Obtains Worker's Compensation Benefits From General Employer






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.