Joseph J. Santarone, Jr.: Lawyer with Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.

Joseph J. Santarone, Jr.

Joseph J. Santarone is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. He is also the Chair of the firm's Public Entity and Civil Rights Practice Group. In this capacity, Joe is responsible for the activities of some 12 attorneys firmwide. For many years, the focus of Joe's practice has been the defense of police officers, municipalities, school districts, public officials, and both private and public sector employers.
Shareholder; Chair, Public Entity & Civil Rights Practice Group; Chair, School Leaders' Liability Practice Group
Philadelphia,  PA  U.S.A.
Phone(215) 575-2626

Peer Rating
 5.0/5.0
AV® Preeminent

Client Rating

Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon
Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials Ratings & Reviews
 

Practice Areas

  • Civil Rights
  • Municipal Liability
  • Professional Liability
  • School Leaders' Liability
  • Employment
 
University La Salle College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, B.A., 1976
 
Law SchoolWidener University School of Law, Wilmington, Delaware, J.D., cum laude, 1985
 
Admitted1986, Pennsylvania; 1986, New Jersey; U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania; U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania; U.S. District Court Western District of Pennsylvania; U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit
 
Memberships 

Associations & Memberships
•American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA)
•Defense Research Institute
•Montgomery County Bar Association
•Pennsylvania Bar Association
•Pennsylvania Bar Institute
•Philadelphia Bar Association
•Philadelphia Lawyers Club
•Public Risk Management Association (PRIMA)
•Widener University School of Law National Advisory Council

 
Biography

Joe serves as the chair of the Public Entity and Civil Rights practice group as well as the School Leaders' Liability practice group. In this capacity, he is responsible for the activities of some 25 attorneys firmwide. The focus of Joe's practice has been in the defense of police officers, municipalities, school districts, public officials, and both private and public sector employers. He has tried in excess of 75 jury trials to verdict in federal court in the areas of civil rights and employment litigation.

Additionally, Joe serves as the supervising attorney for Professional Liability in the Philadelphia office. He has handled numerous professional liability claims, often at the request of the professionals who finds themselves a defendant. In addition to trying many cases to verdict in both federal and state courts, Joe has defended matters at administrative, public hearing and AAA Arbitrations.

In 1976 Joe graduated from LaSalle University and began work as a probation officer for the City of Philadelphia. While working full time, Joe attended the Widener University School of Law where he graduated with honors in 1985. He has been with Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin his entire legal career.

Classes/Seminars Taught

Case Study: Police Matter Resulting in Dealth Following Repeated Deployments of a TASER, Delaware Valley Insurance Trust, June 2013

ADA Amendments Act of 2008 and Its Impact on Employers and EPL Insurers, USLI, November 1, 2011

What is Hearsay, City of Philadelphia Law Department, February 1, 2011

Exposure in Education Cases Related to Due Process and Bullying, Allied World/Darwin Insurance, August 1, 2010

Published Works

•Supervisory Rule Concerning Motions Based On Qualified Immunity Imposed, Lawyers Journal, 2003-09-05

•Third Circuit Rules Plaintiff Failed To Follow Pennsylvania Procedure For Petitioning Grand Jury Files, Defense Digest, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2003

•Third Circuit Imposes Supervisory Rule Concerning Motions Base On Qualified Immunity, Defense Digest, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003

•Township Not Primarily Liable for Settlement of Personal Injury Case Involving Township Employee, Defense Digest, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2001

•Direct Evidence Not Required in Age Discrimination Cases, Defense Digest, Vol., 6, No. 5, 2000

•Student-On-Student Sexual Harassment: The Next Liability Minefield For School Districts, Defense Digest, Oct. Vol. 5, No. 5, 1999

•Third Circuit's Limitation On ADA 'Regarded As' Claims Is Short Lived, Defense Digest, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1998

•If 3rd Circuit Decision Stands, Fewer ADA Claims Can Be Filed, The Legal Intelligencer, December 3, 1997

•Third Circuit Decision Will Cut Down ADA Claims, Defense Digest, Vol. 3, No. 6, 1997

•Superior Court Cuts Award in Sexual Harassment Case, Defense Digest, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1997

•Sex-Based Shift Assignments: Employers May Use Common Sense (Co-Author),” Defense Digest, Vol. 2, No. 7, 1996

•Employment Discrimination Claims: Arbitration Under Collective Bargaining Clauses (Co-Author), Defense Digest, Vol. 2, No. 6, 1996

Honors & Awards
• AV Preeminent by LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell
• Best Lawyers in America , Civil Rights Law, 2015
•Pennsylvania Super Lawyer, 2013-2014

Year Joined Organization: 1987

 
Reported CasesSignificant Representative Matters: Defense verdict in a discrimination case before the U.S. District Court of Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff's termination from employment was, in part, based on the statements of women in the shelter where plaintiff worked whose identities could not be disclosed and did not testify. We argued that the decision makers' state of mind was what was relevant and that the statements of the women in the shelter were not hearsay since they were not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. The plaintiff appealed and the case was affirmed by the 3rd Circuit.; Obtained a defense verdict for Montgomery County and the District Attorney. A Montgomery County detective sued the District Attorney following his termination for poor job performance. The initial granting of Summary Judgment by the Eastern District of Federal Court was reversed by the 3rd Circuit and remanded for trial. The court found the reasons for the termination were not a pretext for unlawful discrimination.; Successfully defended three different civil rights suits where police officers shot suspects in the back, where it was later learned the suspects were unarmed.; Defense verdict in jail suicide case where the entire suicide was caught on video tape and played before the jury.; Successfully defended school district in IDEA case for alleged failure to provide special education for female high school student.; Defense verdict for County in wrongful termination and defamation case where health department employee was discharged, E. coli outbreak and Commissioner identified her in pubic newscasts.; Defense verdict for a County brought by employee claiming his termination was based on race.; Defense verdict for private employer where plaintiff alleged age and sex discrimination.; Defense verdict for numerous police officers involved in arrest of a minister who suffered a heart attack after alleged excessive force. The plaintiff turned down a significant offer to settle before the lengthy trial resulted in complete exoneration for the officers.; Successfully defended and argued in the 3rd Circuit, which affirmed in favor of the officers, in significant case where criminal defendant, with no prior record, spend 11 months in jail on charges of killing his parents before the charges where dropped. Case is often cited on issues of probable cause.; Grant of Summary Judgment, which was affirmed by 3rd Circuit, in case where a teacher was arrested for stealing supplies but later cleared. The 3rd Circuit opinion is cited by many courts regarding the issues of reliance by police on eye witnesses for issues of establishing probable cause. Published Works ;Supervisory Rule Concerning Motions Based On Qualified Immunity Imposed, Lawyers Journal , 2003 -09-05 ;Third Circuit Rules Plaintiff Failed To Follow Pennsylvania Procedure For Petitioning Grand Jury Files, Defense Digest , Vol. 9, No. 4, 2003 ;Third Circuit Imposes Supervisory Rule Concerning Motions Base On Qualified Immunity, Defense Digest , Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003 ;Township Not Primarily Liable for Settlement of Personal Injury Case Involving Township Employee, Defense Digest , Vol. 7, No. 1, 2001 ;Direct Evidence Not Required in Age Discrimination Cases, Defense Digest , Vol., 6, No. 5, 2000 ;Student-On-Student Sexual Harassment: The Next Liability Minefield For School Districts, Defense Digest , Oct. Vol. 5, No. 5, 1999 ;Third Circuit's Limitation On ADA 'Regarded As' Claims Is Short Lived, Defense Digest , Vol. 4, No. 4, 1998 ;If 3rd Circuit Decision Stands, Fewer ADA Claims Can Be Filed, The Legal Intelligencer , December 3, 1997 ;Third Circuit Decision Will Cut Down ADA Claims, Defense Digest , Vol. 3, No. 6, 1997 ;Superior Court Cuts Award in Sexual Harassment Case, Defense Digest , Vol. 3, No. 3, 1997 ;Sex-Based Shift Assignments: Employers May Use Common Sense (Co-Author), Defense Digest , Vol. 2, No. 7, 1996 ;Employment Discrimination Claims: Arbitration Under Collective Bargaining Clauses (Co-Author), Defense Digest , Vol. 2, No. 6, 1996
 
ISLN904045466
 


View Ratings & Reviews
Profile Visibility
#1,301 in weekly profile views out of 16,096 lawyers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
#114,626 in weekly profile views out of 1,606,920 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Joseph J. Santarone, Jr.

2000 Market Street, Suite 2300
PhiladelphiaPA 19103




Loading...
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now