Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Law Firm Profile > People > Lawyer Profile

Josh M. Kantrow

  - Lawyer Profile
 



Josh M. Kantrow

Josh M. Kantrow

Partner
 
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
120 N. La Salle Street
26th Floor
Chicago, Illinois  60602-2412
(Cook Co.)

Telephone: 312-704-0550
Facsimile: 312-704-1522
http://www.wilsonelser.com



Profile Visibility
#1,035 in weekly profile views out of 25,647 lawyers in Chicago, Illinois
#45,925 in weekly profile views out of 958,159 total lawyers Overall
Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon


Experience & Credentials Client/Peer Review Ratings™
 


EducationLouisiana State University, Paul M. Hebert Law Center, J.D., 1990, Louisiana State University, B.S., Finance, 1987
 
Admitted1991, Louisiana, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; 1996, Illinois, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois and U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; 2000, New York
 
MembershipsIllinois State and Louisiana State Bar Associations; Maritime Law Association of the United States; Professional Liability Underwriter's Association.
 
BornBaton Rouge, Louisiana
 
BiographyPresentations: "Resolving Claims Made under Cyber-Risk Policies," American Conference Institute's Forum on Cyber Risk Insurance, Philadelphia, September 26, 2007; "Technology Risks: Knowledge is Power," 2006 ASHRM Seminar, San Diego, October 31, 2006; "Overview of U.S. Court System and Tort/Class Action Reform," Katie School of Insurance, Illinois State University, Bloomington, Illinois, July 6, 2005; "Rescue Counsel: Strategies for Defending Indefensible Cases in Difficult Jurisdictions," Illinois State University, Katie Insurance School Seminar, Bloomington, Illinois, March 31, 2004; "Key Trends in U.S. Law," Katie School of Insurance at Illinois State University, Bloomington, IL, July 13, 2004; "Defending Complex Claims - Aggressive Motion Practice," presented at insurance client seminars in New York, London and Paris, June 17, 22 and 24, 2004; "Overview of U.S. Court System and U.S. Litigation," In-house seminars, London insurance clients, London, October 2002 and March 2003; "Recent Developments in U.S. Law," at the International Underwriting Association and Lloyd's Underwriting Association, London, October 16, 2000.
 
ISLN901432924
 
TransactionsFirst chaired, as rescue counsel, first-party bad faith insurance coverage trial for certain London market insurers in unfavorable southern United States venue involving over $25 million at issue; The case settled after trial; The bad faith litigation was proceeding adversely against Underwriters, prior counsel did not properly assert federal court jurisdiction and the policyholder attempted to transfer the case to state court; As rescue counsel, Josh amended the pleadings, secured the necessary affidavits and convinced the federal court to retain jurisdiction; Thereafter, he persuaded the court to sever Underwriters' declaratory judgment action from the policyholder's bad faith claims, and to try the declaratory judgment action first; After first-chairing the declaratory judgment trial and obtaining significant rulings in his client's favor, the case settled for a nominal sum; Underwriters faced serious bad faith exposure based on post-claim underwriting and had the case reserved for a multi-million dollar amount prior to Josh's involvement; Defeated, as rescue counsel, a Fortune 500 corporation's claim for coverage under $25 million professional liability policy by winning motion to dismiss for foreign insurers in pro-insured state court venue; Case is currently on appeal; Defended, as rescue counsel, foreign insurers in a complex professional liability coverage dispute against a major U.S. corporation involving a $25 million policy limit; Prior to Josh's involvement, the insurers had reserved the case for approximately eighty percent of the policy limit; The claim fell within the insuring agreement and underwriters' sole defense pertained to a single exclusion that was arguably ambiguous; Following two and a half years of aggressive litigation in unfavorable venue for insurers, and savvy negotiations, settlement was attained for a significant (and confidential) multimillion dollar (eight figure) discount off the $25 million policy limits claim; Negotiated favorable resolution of complex multimillion data theft claim against technology service provider for slightly less than twenty percent of the value of the claim; The claim, pursued by several major U.S. banks and credit card issuers, involved coordinated theft of data in transit from hundreds of automatic teller machines; Tried two jury cases in the Circuit Court of Cook County in Chicago, one of the most unfavorable venues for business litigants in America, involving amounts in dispute of $30 million and $10 million; The first trial was covered extensively by the local media; Both cases settled on appeal for amounts substantially less than pre-trial demands; Settled several days before trial, as rescue counsel, a serious maritime wrongful death case pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County that former counsel had suggested the insurer reserve for several million dollars; Josh prepared the case for trial and settled it on the eve of the trial; The client had provided settlement authority of $1.5m going into the mediation.
 

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com


Firms Must Comply With FTC "Red Flags" Data Protection Rule, Starting November 1, 2009
Louis H. Castoria, Josh M. Kantrow, Lori S. Nugent, November 10, 2009
The Federal Trade Commission's "Red Flags" Rule is designed to protect personally identifiable information from data thieves. Insurance brokerage firms and other service providers that receive payment after their services have been delivered are required to comply. The compliance deadline...

Red Flags Rule Enforcement by FTC Begins August 1, 2009: Most Business Must Comply
Lori S. Nugent, Josh M. Kantrow, Adam R. Bialek, July 8, 2009
The Red Flags Rule is designed to protect personal identifiable information from data thieves. While many people believe that data protection regulation applies only to hospitals and banks, data thieves are attacking other businesses, so regulation has expanded.


 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this lawyer? Share your experience as a Client of this lawyer and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only


Quickly and easily expand your professional network – join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the Martindale-Hubbell database – over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now
 


 

Compare this Lawyer

Compare this lawyer to other lawyers in your Watch List.
 

Add lawyer to My Watch List

As a registered user of martindale.com you can add lawyers to your Watch List. You can securely add comments, compare lawyers in your Watch List, and access these lawyers with one click from your martindale.com homepage.