Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

Judge Gene David Cohen, (Ret)

143G City Hall
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
Peer Rating
4.8 of 5.0
Client Rating
N/R
Peer Reviewed
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Commercial Litigation; Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
University
National Judicial College, Certified Mediation Training; Temple University, Master of Public Administration; University of Nevada, Master of Judicial Studies
Law School
Temple University School of Law, J.D.
Admitted
1971, Pennsylvania; Supreme Court of the United States; Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
ISLN
908307140
Peer Reviews (5)
Peer Reviewed
4.8/5.0
Peer Rating
 
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Litigation, Toxic Tort Defense and Civil Litigation
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
4.8/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.8/5
Judgment
4.8/5
Communication Ability
4.6/5
Legal Experience
4.8/5
Peer Reviews (5)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Of Counsel on 05/17/10
An ex-judge, Gene Cohen is a very smart and capable attorney, who can reach the best results for his clients.
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/09/10
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 05/03/10
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Member on 04/30/10
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/17/10
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.