|
Keesal, Young & Logan
A Professional Corporation
Size of Organization: 60 Year Established: 1970 Web Site: http://www.kyl.com
Telephone: 562-436-2000
Telecopier: 562-436-7416
| |
Profile Visibility 
#2,069 in weekly profile views out of 264,196 total law firms Overall |
|
|
| |
The firm specializes in business, securities, employment, admiralty, professional malpractice, environmental, products liability and municipal litigation, in addition to a general business practice that includes corporate finance, securities, commercial law, intellectual property, real estate and Investment Adviser Law. Keesal, Young & Logan provides quality, results-oriented legal services to its clients. Those clients are a prestigious group from the securities, financial services, real estate, insurance and maritime industries. With offices in Anchorage, Ketchikan, Long Beach, San Francisco, Hong Kong and Seattle, KY&L attorneys routinely handle matters throughout the western United States and the Pacific Rim, ranging from civil trials, arbitrations, labor disputes, regulatory proceedings, shipboard investigations and commercial transactions.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Keesal, Young & Logan
A Professional Corporation:
26
Documents by Keesal, Young & Logan
A Professional Corporation on Martindale.com
| |
California Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Decision In BrinkerApril 16, 2012 The California Supreme Court issued its landmark decision today in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court. Among several key issues decided by the Court was whether California employers need only provide meal breaks to employees or whether they must ensure that meal breaks are actually taken.... Armendariz — Alive and WellMarch 5, 2012 On Monday, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District confirmed the continuing viability of the unconscionability defense to arbitration as articulated by the California Supreme Court in Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83. In Mayers v. Volt...
|
|