- Business Litigation
- Real Estate Litigation
- Eminent Domain
- Inverse Condemnation
- Professional Liability
University of California, Berkeley, B.S., Finance, 1976
University of California, Hastings College of Law, J.D., 1979
1979, California and U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1980, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California; 1981, U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern Districts of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1988, Wisconsin, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin and U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; 1990, U.S. Court of Federal Claims and U.S. Supreme Court
Extern/Law Clerk for Hon. Oliver Seth, Chief Judge of U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, 1979. Member, Judicial Evaluation Committee, 1988-1992, Vice-Chair, 1989-1992, and Condemnation and Land Valuation Committee, 1989—, Chairman, 1992-1993, Los Angeles County Bar Association. Member, Real Property Section, State Bar of California, Co-Chairman, Inverse Condemnation and Eminent Domain Subsection, 1995-1997. Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers.
American College of Trial Lawyers. Member: American Bar Association.
CUNA Mutual Insurance v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2003) 108 Cal. App. 4th 382; Hawthorne Red. Agency v. Force Electronics (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 622; City of Vista v. Fiedler (1996) 13 Cal. 4th 612; Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. Trump Wilshire Assoc. (1996) 42 Cal.App. 4th 1682; Pincus v. Pabst Brewing Co. (1990) 893 F2d 1544; S.C.R.T.D. v. Bolen (1992) 1 Cal. 4th 654 ; Myers v. Atchison, Topeka (1990) 224 Cal.App. 3d 752; State of Calif. v. Union Pacific et al (1985) 179 Cal.App.3d 307.
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com