- Insurance Law
- Product Liability
- Toxic Tort Law
- Employment Law
- Civil Rights Law
- Professional Malpractice
|University ||University of Virginia, B.A., with High Distinction, 1977; University of Vienna, Austria, Rotary International Graduate Fellow, 1977-1978|
|Law School||Villanova University School of Law, Villanova, Pennsylvania, J.D., 1981; Villanova Law Review, Articles Editor, 1980-1981, Staff Member, 1979-1980; Temple Law School Academy of Advocacy, 1992 Fellow|
|Admitted||1982, Delaware; 1982, Pennsylvania; 1983, U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit; 1982, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania; 1982, District Court District of Delaware|
Associations & Memberships
•Defense Counsel of Delaware
•Defense Research Institute
•Delaware Bar Association
•Delaware Claims Association
•Trial Attorneys of America
Kevin has served as managing attorney of the firm's Wilmington, Delaware, office since its inception in 1995. As managing shareholder of the Wilmington office, Kevin oversees the day-to-day operations for the entire office, ensuring that client matters are handled promptly, professionally and effectively.
As a member of the casualty department, Kevin handles catastrophic injury and damages claims involving product liability, construction defect, motor vehicle, fire and property claims, premises liability and toxic tort litigation. In addition to his extensive experience in casualty insurance defense litigation, Kevin has defended numerous defamation, commercial libel and professional malpractice cases. He has also handled employment discrimination and wrongful discharge cases under federal and state law, as well as the defense of municipal liability cases under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Kevin routinely appears before the Delaware Human Relations Commission, the Delaware Department of Labor and in the Delaware Court of Chancery in matters of equity.
Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey in 1993, Kevin was a partner with the firm of Liebert, Short and Hirshland in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he practiced law for 11 years. After graduating from law school, Kevin served as a law clerk to former Associate Justice John J. McNeilly of the Delaware Supreme Court, Delaware's highest appellate court.
•Taught seminars: strict liability, motor vehicle, and Pennsylvania and Delaware Insurance law (1990-2007)
Past Employment Positions
•Supreme Court of Delaware, Hon. John J. McNeilly, Associate Justice, Law Clerk, 1981 - 1982
• The Admissibility of Vehicle Photographs and the Correlation of Minimal Damages with Minimal Injuries, Defense Digest, Vol. 9, No. 4, December, 2003
• Note, Commonwealth v. Bussey, 26 Villanova Law Review 205, 1981
Marshall Dennehey Relocates Wilmington Office to Nemours Building
October 27, 2014
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman and Goggin has relocated from North Market Street in downtown Wilmington to the landmark Nemours building. Effective today, the office's new address is 1007 N. Orange Street, Suite 600, Wilmington, DE 19801. All telephone numbers remain the same, with the exception...
On the Pulse...Profile of Our Wilmington, Delaware Office
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2013
by Kevin J. Connors, Esq.*It is hard to imagine that over eight years have passed since I was asked to write about the Wilmington, Delaware, office of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. I do so now with great pride in the invaluable..., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 3, September 2013Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide...
Delaware Premises Liability
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2012
Key Points:The Supreme Court of Delaware confirms that willful and wanton common law premises liability standard applies to both trespassers and licensees.Defense practitioners must hold non-business invitee plaintiffs to this..., Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2012
Year Joined Organization
|Reported Cases||Significant Representative Matters: Successfully represented publisher of magazine in commercial trade libel case. Major insurer of podiatrists sued rival insurance company and publisher for advertisement claiming plaintiff would be unable to meet coverage obligations in the future. Plaintiff's claims were predicated upon interference with contracts and violation of the federal Lanham Act. Following a week-long trial, jury determined publisher was not liable under any theory. Defense verdict was upheld on appeal to Third Circuit Court of Appeals.; Jury verdict for defense in product liability action alleging manufacturing defect in electric timer caused significant property damage. Plaintiffs sought to support claim of product defect with fire cause and origin experts. Defense successfully presented independent electrical engineers and in-house experts who proved fire was caused by device not associated with the timer.; Summary judgment and affirmance on appeal by Delaware Supreme Court in wrongful death case wherein decedent's representative sought to bring a direct cause of action against plaintiff's employer. Delaware Supreme Court, in affirming matter, clarified permissible basis for bringing and supporting a direct cause of action against a plaintiff's employer. This case is often cited by defense counsel in matters involving the workers' compensation exclusivity bar.; Summary judgment entered in favor of defendant. Represented tenant store in large outlet shopping mall from which an allegedly false alarm was emitted. A police officer, attempting to respond to alarm, struck a motor vehicle, flipping it over several times. One child was killed, and there were other significant injuries to other vehicle occupants. The basis for Motion for Summary Judgment was absence of a duty of care under the factual circumstances of the case as a matter of law. Decision upheld by the Delaware Supreme Court.; Represented excavator in case wherein a gas explosion occurred and most of a city block was leveled with serious injuries to certain individuals, lesser injuries to others and questionable injuries to multiple other parties. Basis for the litigation was failure to properly mark underground utilities prior to excavation. Key issue was employment status of a particular individual. During trial, the matter successfully settled.; Jury returned verdict for defense in product liability case against power tool manufacturer. Trial featured testimony by engineering experts concerning an on/off switch on a power saw. First trial resulted in hung jury. Second trial resulted in non-suit in favor of defense. Defense demonstrated that plaintiff's expert had mixed up critical pieces of power saw, establishing that the factual basis for his opinions were invalid.; Jury verdict in favor of defendant escalator manufacturer in product liability action alleging design defect in end plate/comb plate configuration, causing plaintiff to have toes amputated. Plaintiff's expert opined that comb plate was defective in not being designed to break off in a wedge-in contact. The defense successfully demonstrated that plaintiff misused escalator and illustrated safety features of comb plate/end plate and escalator in general.; Summary judgment obtained in claim by prisoner that corporate health care provider in the state's prison system was deliberately indifferent in violation of 1983 civil rights and medically negligent in failing to afford plaintiff treatment for an allegedly serious medical condition. Plaintiff claimed he suffered from number of distinct medical conditions and had exhausted all administrative remedies prior to filing suit. Summary judgment was awarded on the grounds that plaintiff received proper medical care and failed to exhaust all administrative remedies.; Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Motion to Dismiss in favor of councilpersons against whom a political candidate filed a 1983 civil rights claim alleging violations of his civil rights by making defamatory remarks against him in retaliation for exercising his first amendment rights to free speech and petition. Plaintiff sought restrictions for election signs during political campaigns and spoke to defendant councilpersons opposed to proposed legislative restrictions. Plaintiff's complaint alleged that a newspaper reported that defendant councilpersons said plaintiff had made threatening remarks to them, which caused plaintiff to suffer damages and injury to his reputation. Defendants asserted plaintiff failed to demonstrate it was clearly established that an individual had a constitutional right not to be subjected to defamatory remarks in retaliation for engaging in constitutionally protected first amendment activity. The Court engaged in extended discussion of client councilpersons' defense of qualified immunity and granted their Motion to Dismiss on theory of qualified immunity. Published Works: The Admissibility of Vehicle Photographs and the Correlation of Minimal Damages with Minimal Injuries, Defense Digest, Vol. 9, No. 4, December, 2003; Note, Commonwealth v. Bussey, 26 Villanova Law Review 205, 1981|
View Ratings & Reviews
|Profile Visibility |
|#284 in weekly profile views out of 3,873 lawyers in Wilmington, Delaware|
|#99,354 in weekly profile views out of 1,733,233 total lawyers Overall|