Kevin M. McKeon: Lawyer with Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.

Kevin M. McKeon

Kevin M. McKeon is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. He has over 20 years of experience defending manufacturers and corporations in products liability cases with an emphasis on defending product warranty cases involving claims pursuant to the Pennsylvania and New Jersey lemon laws, breach of warranty, and consumer fraud statutes.
Phone(856) 414-6003

Peer Rating
AV® Preeminent

Client Rating

Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon
Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials Ratings & Reviews

Practice Areas

  • Product Liability
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Consumer Protection
  • Premises Liability - Defense
University Boston College, B.A., 1983 Dean's List, 1979-1983
Law SchoolRutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Law - Camden, Camden, New Jersey, J.D., 1986 Dean's List, 1983-1986
Admitted1986, Pennsylvania; 1986, New Jersey; 1986, District Court District of New Jersey; 1986, U.S District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania; 1996, U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit; 2001, U.S. Supreme Court; 2008, U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Associations & Memberships

• American Boat and Yacht Council

• Camden County Bar Association

• Defense Research Institute

• Warranty Defense Counsel


Kevin has 25 years of experience representing manufacturers, corporations and businesses in product liability, product warranty and premises liability cases. He has had cases dismissed on behalf of defendants in product liability cases. He defends manufacturers in product warranty cases involving claims pursuant to federal and state statutes, including the Pennsylvania and New Jersey lemon laws, breach of warranty and consumer fraud acts. He represents defendants in premises liability cases.

Kevin had represented and litigated cases for major manufacturers in a variety of industries, including automobiles, truck, boats, homes, and recreational vehicles and equipment. He has litigated cases on behalf of warranty and service contract companies and builders.

He has tried over 75 cases to jury verdicts, numerous bench trials and handled class actions. He has also argued before appellate courts, including the New Jersey Supreme Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Kevin also serves as an arbitrator in the Commercial Arbitration program in the Superior Court, Camden County, New Jersey.

Published Works

•Impaired Cognizance of Injury From Sexual Abuse May Not Trigger the Discovery Rule, Defense Digest, Vol. 6, No. 6, December 2000

•Strict Liability and Negligence Claims May be Barred in New Jersey Products Liability Cases Involving Damage to the Product, Defense Digest, 1998-02, Vol. 4, No. 1

•The Defense of Charitable Organizations Takes a Turn for the Better, Defense Digest, April 1995

Honors & Awards
• AV Preeminent by LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell
•New Jersey Super Lawyer, 2005
•Panelist, PBS television shows, Consumer Fraud Issues
•Swarthmore s Who s Who

Year Joined Organization: 1993

Legal Certifications

•Commercial Arbitrator - Camden County, New Jersey

Reported CasesSignificant Representative Matters; Malin v. Bayliner Corp., 148 F. 3d 1154 (3rd Cir. 1998), Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed trial court's dismissal of boat manufacturer after lengthy trial involving claims of breach of warranty, fraud, revocation of acceptance. Palmucci v. Brunswick Corp., 311 N.J. Super. 607, 710 A. 2d 1045 (App. Div. 1998). Holding that manufacturers are entitled to at least one opportunity to cure an allegedly defective product prior to plaintiff filing suit. Wanetick v. OCT Partnership , 318 N.J. Super. 156, 723 A. 2d 100 (App. Div. 1999). Holding that an ultimate outcome charge must be given to a jury in a consumer fraud case. Suber v. Chrysler Corp., 104 F. 3d 578 (3rd Cir. 1997). Determining federal jurisdictional issues and stating that a manufacturer cannot be held liable for actions of a dealer absent an indicia of ownership of the dealer in a consumer fraud case. Poli v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 349 N.J. Super. 169, 793 A. 2d 104 (App. Div. 2001). holding that there is a two-year statute of limitation in a lemon law claim, and addressing breach of warranty statute of limitation issues. Wanetick v. Gateway Mitsubishi , 163 N.J. 484, 750 A. 2d 79 (2000). New Jersey Supreme Court ruling holding that an ultimate outcome charge must be given to a jury in a Consumer Fraud Act case; Model Jury Charges amended to reflect this ruling. Ryan v. American Honda , 186 N.J. 431, 896 A. 2d 454 (2006). Holding that leases are covered in New Jersey under the federal Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. Divigenze v. Chrysler Corp., 345 N.J. Super. 314, 785 A. 2d 37 (App. Div. 2001), cert. den. 171 N.J. 442, 794 A. 2d 181 (2002). Addressing plaintiff's burden of proof and jury instructions in a lemon law case. Obtained complete summary judgments dismissing entire cases for multiple automobile manufacturers in numerous cases in New Jersey and Pennsylvania involving the Pennsylvania and New Jersey lemon laws, breach of warranty (Uniform Commercial Code), Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and consumer fraud statutes. Had plaintiff dismiss product liability fire loss case against product manufacturer in claim for over $500,000 in property damage by proving through experts that client's product did not cause fire. Had plaintiff dismiss products liability case against exercise equipment manufacturer in personal injury case by establishing that client's product did not cause the injury and injury either did not take place or was caused by othe defendants. Defense verdict in jury trial on behalf of boat manufacturer in product warranty case where plaintiff claimed a defect in a boat led to a boat sinking in Atlantic Ocean.Representative Cases; Miranda v. MarineMax, 2013 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2419 (App. Div. 2013); McGarvey v. Penske , 486 Fed. Appx. 276 (3rd Cir. 2012); Washington v. Thiele Manuf. , 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66547 (D.N.J. 2012); Patel v. American Honda Motor Co., 2011 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1146 (App. Div. 2011); Ferrari v. American Honda Motor Co. , 2009 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 346 (App. Div. 2009); Smith v. Cavalier Builders , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23457 (D.N.J. 2008); Divigenze v. Chrysler Corp. , 345 N.J. Super. 314, 785 A.2d 37 (cert. den. 171 N.J. 442, 794 A.2d 181 2002); Wanetick v. Gateway Mitsubishi, et al , 163 N.J. 484, 750 A.2d 79 (2002); Poli v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. , 349 N.J. Super. 169, 793 A.2d 104 (App. Div. 2001); Wanetick v. OCT Partnership , 318 N.J. Super. 156, 723 A.2d 100 (App. Div. 1999); Palmucci v. Brunswick Corporation , 311 N.J. Super. 607, 710 A.2d 1045 (App. Div. 1998); Suber v. Chrysler Corporation , 104 F.3d 578 (3rd Cir. 1997)

View Ratings & Reviews
Profile Visibility
#84 in weekly profile views out of 1,482 lawyers in Cherry Hill, New Jersey
#111,830 in weekly profile views out of 1,616,736 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Kevin M. McKeon

200 Lake Drive East
Cherry HillNJ 08002


Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now