University of Arizona, B.S., with distinction, 1982
University of Arizona, J.D., cum laude, 1989
1989, Arizona and U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; 1993, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1999, U.S. Supreme Court
Pima County, Maricopa County and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Arizona.
Lane Oden concentrates his practice on commercial real estate matters, real estate development, land use and zoning, commercial transactions, real estate and business acquisitions, and construction law. Over the last twenty plus years, Mr. Oden has represented sellers and buyers, lenders and borrowers, landlords and tenants, real estate developers, national retailers, and others in a wide variety of real estate and business transactions. His experience includes real estate sales and purchases, financing, subdivision, leases and other matters; rezoning, variances and other land use approvals, including representation of clients before various legislative and administrative bodies; municipal and county land use regulation, including development agreements, planned area developments, and annexation.
Mr. Oden received his J.D., cum laude, from the University of Arizona in 1989, where he served on the Arizona Law Review. After graduating from law school, Mr. Oden practiced for several years at a large Phoenix law firm before returning to Tucson, where he has practiced since 1993. Mr. Oden is admitted to practice in the Arizona state courts, the Arizona federal courts, the Ninth Circuit court of appeals, and the United States Supreme Court
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com