Lauren Moser is a member of the Professional Liability Department, where she defends clients in construction industry-related litigation. Lauren also focuses her employment law practice on the defense of employers in a variety of claims including discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination and breach of contract. She has extensive experience handling Section 1981, Title VII, ADA, FMLA and PHRA matters. Lauren represents clients in state and federal courts and has appeared before the PHRC. She was introduced to Marshall Dennehey when she started working as a summer law clerk in 2010.
In May 2007, Lauren graduated with honors from James Madison University with a Bachelor's Degree in Finance. She attended Temple University Beasley School of Law, where she earned her juris doctor with honors in 2010.
During law school, Lauren participated in the United States Attorney: Bankruptcy Unit Clinical and the Philadelphia Housing Court Clinical at Temple University. She was also a research articles editor for Temple University's Journal of Science, Technology and Environmental Law.
Honors & Awards
•Pennsylvania Super Lawyer Rising Star, 2014-2016
The 2016 Super Lawyers list is issued by Thompson Reuters. A description of the selection methodology can be found here. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
•Case Law Alerts, regular contributor, 2014-present
• Beil v. Telesis and the Retained Control Exception, The Legal Intelligencer, August 7, 2012
Year Joined Organization
Marshall Dennehey Partners With Widener Law Schools Veterans Law Clinic
August 2, 2013
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin has partnered with the Veterans Law Clinic of Widener Law School to provide pro bono legal services through its Volunteer Attorney Program. The clinic provides free legal representation to veterans and their dependents with disability compensation...
The Bilt-Rite exception to the economic loss doctrine does not apply to a service contractor who merely provided information used to troubleshoot or repair an HVAC system after it was installed.
July 19, 2016
As part of a renovation construction project, a new air conditioning system was installed at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia. Due to errors that arose during the installation, the system was not ready for “start-up and testing” by..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2016Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
The only element of common law fraud a homeowner must prove to prevail in a claim under the Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law against their homebuilder is justifiable reliance.
January 15, 2016
The plaintiffs sued their homebuilder/contractor, alleging claims sounding in breach of contract, violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL), 73 Pa.C.S. 201-1, et seq., and breach of warranty arising from..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2016Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide...
Restatement (Second) Contracts 302 requisite assert 3rd-party beneficiary breach of contract claim against atty can be satisfied w/out beneficiary named in Will/contract if situation shows intent for non-named beneficiary to benefit from contract/will.
April 1, 2015
The plaintiffs brought a legal malpractice action against the defendant attorneys for their alleged failure to properly prepare the testamentary documents for the Estate of Robert H. Agnew. Specifically, the defendants allegedly failed to obtain the..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2015 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Shareholder cannot assert individual claim against the corporation and/or a corporate officer if claim is dependent upon and/or derivative to the corporation's injuries.
April 1, 2014
The plaintiff brought an individual action against the defendant and Milestone Ranch (the corporation for which the plaintiff and the defendant were the sole shareholders, directors and officers) alleging that he sustained damages from the defendant..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2014
Beil v. Telesis and the Retained Control Exception
August 7, 2012