- Retail Liability
- Sports and Entertainment
- Premises Liability - Defense
|University ||Ursinus College, B.A., English, 1997 Best Paper - European Union Law, 1998, Howard Trucksess Prize - displayed unusual promise in study of law, 1997, Sigma Tau Delta, National English Honor Society, 1996-1997|
|Law School||Temple University School of Law, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, J.D., 2000|
|Admitted||2000, Pennsylvania; 2000, New Jersey; 2000, U.S. District Court District of New Jersey; 2002, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania|
Associations & Memberships
• Pennsylvania Bar Association
• Philadelphia Association of Defense Counsel
• Philadelphia Bar Association
Laurie handles premises liability matters for retail facilities, daycare centers, amusement parks, homeowners and businesses involving personal injury matters and governmental entities. Laurie is also a certified arbitrator in Philadelphia.
Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Laurie served as a law clerk to the Honorable Gene D. Cohen in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County where she wrote judicial opinions, observed trials, and prepared lecture materials for the National Judicial College.
Laurie is a graduate of Temple University School of Law and Ursinus College.
•Trying a Case in State Court from Start to Finish, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, July 2012, June 2014
•Preservation of Evidence--Counsel's Responsibility?, Defense Research Institute 15th Annual Personal Injury Potpourri, Philadelphia, PA, April 16, 2013
•Handling the Slip Trip & Fall, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, Winter 2012, August 2010
•Pennsylvania's New Joint and Several Liability Law, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, October 2011
•Premises Liability Seminar, Pennsylvania Association for Justice, 2010
•How the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 Will Impact our Practice, May 26, 2009
•Accident Documentation and Investigation, 2007, 2008
Honors & Awards
•Pennsylvania Super Lawyer Rising Star, 2005 -2008, 2013 -2014
Year Joined Organization: 2001
Managing a Litigation Practice from a Woman's Perspective
Articles • July 1, 2014
The Dispute Resolution Institute's 15th Annual Personal Injury Potpourri
Seminar • Apr 16, 2013
Topics include: Confidential Insight into the Sandusky case; PA Civil Litigation Update; Automobile Appellate Watch; Important Tips for Product Cases; Courtroom Conduct that Jurors Dislike; Deposing the Independent Witness; Unique Technology...
|Reported Cases||Significant Representative Matters: Obtained a defense verdict in a lawsuit alleging that the defendant set off a firework that struck an 11 year old girl on her back, resulting in second degree burns and permanent scarring. Plaintiffs alleged through two independent eyewitnesses that the defendant was the perpetrator, though the defendant was acquitted in his criminal trial. The jury was not permitted to hear any evidence regarding the criminal trial, and the jury was not allowed to know that the defendant was acquitted. The jury found that the defendant was not negligent.; Defense verdict in lawsuit alleging negligent supervision by daycare facility of five-year-old child who sustained a severe fracture to his arm. Plaintiffs alleged that daycare employee was not properly spotting the child while he swung on the monkey bars at a local playground. Jury found defendant was not negligent because child had swung on monkey bars before without spotting and employee was standing just several feet away. Plaintiffs were awarded $40,000 at initial arbitration.; Defense verdict in lawsuit alleging negligence by amusement park for failing to provide a safe egress for adult on a water slide. Plaintiffs alleged that amusement park did not provide adequate assistance to adult patron who was unable to exit an inner tube and who hit her head on the bottom of the pool. Jury found defendant was not negligent because of videotape showing many patrons using same attraction without incident and plaintiff was responsible for her own incident. Plaintiffs were awarded $15,000 at initial arbitration.; Defense verdict in lawsuit alleging negligence by amusement park for failing to provide a safe environment for five-yearold child on an attractive nuisance staircase. Plaintiffs alleged that amusement park did not provide sufficient padding in and around a staircase featuring a prominent television character. Jury found defendant was not negligent because defendant is not required to protect its patrons from mere accidents. Plaintiffs were awarded $8,500 at initial arbitration.; Defense verdict in lawsuit alleging assault and battery by employees of retail facility during shoplifting incident. Plaintiff alleged that retail facility was negligent for allowing two of its employees to physically assault suspected shoplifters while questioning them. Jury found defendant was not negligent because plaintiff's evidence was not credible to support that such an assault even occurred, even though Plaintiff sustained an orbital fracture.; Defense verdict in a slip and fall matter. Plaintiff alleged that she slipped and fell on a tar spot located on the sidewalk of a property rented by our clients where she sustained injuries that required surgery. Plaintiff lived only four houses away, but claimed she had never seen the tar spot before, despite having lived there for fourteen years, and taking daily walks in the area. Our clients had only moved into the property three months before the fall occurred, and they had never noticed the tar spot before. Our expert engineer tested the tar spot and told the jury that it was not slippery and was not a defect. The case was complicated by the fact that there was a dusting of snow on the ground, which plaintiff claims obscured the tar spot. Plaintiff testified that the snow did not cause her fall, rather, it was the tar spot alone. The 8 member jury deliberated for 25 minutes before finding no negligence.; Defense verdict in a case slip and fall matter. Plaintiff claimed that she tripped and fell down the steps inside of the home she rented from our clients, when a piece of the top step broke off unexpectedly. Our clients testified that they had no notice of a dangerous condition, and plaintiff presented no evidence that anyone had knowledge of the deterioration of the steps. In addition, plaintiff's 6 prior criminal convictions for theft, forgery, criminal trespass, etc. were all admitted into evidence. Plaintiff attempted to argue that she turned her life around shortly before the incident happened, and our incident set her back, but the jury didn't buy it. In closing, plaintiff's attorney labeled one of our medical experts a paid assassin and asked the jurors to give the plaintiff something to celebrate. The jury was out for less than a half hour and found that our clients were not negligent, 12 - 0. Published Works ;Managing a Litigation Practice From a Woman's Perspective, The Pennsylvania Lawyer, July-August, 2014 ;Let's Spare Some Trees - Standard Discovery Requests in Philadelphia Arbitration Cases, Defense Digest , Vol. 11, No. 3, September 2005 ;With Friends Like These, Who Needs Enemies? Defense Digest , Vol. 10, No. 4, December 2004 ;The Jury Can Only Follow the Instructions It's Given: An Analysis of Vallone v. Creech, Defense Digest , Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2003|
|Profile Visibility |
|#501 in weekly profile views out of 15,781 lawyers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania|
|#42,688 in weekly profile views out of 1,587,858 total lawyers Overall|