|
Malvern (Griff) U. Griffin, IIIPartner
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP 999 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia
30309-3996 (DeKalb & Fulton Cos.)
Telephone: (404) 853-8233 Fax: 404-853-8806 http://www.sutherland.com
|
Profile Visibility  | | #738 in weekly profile views out of 12,025 lawyers in Atlanta, Georgia | | #45,925 in weekly profile views out of 958,159 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Intellectual Property; Intellectual Property Licensing; Intellectual Property Portfolio Management; Electronic Intellectual Property; Patents; Computer and Software Patents; International Patent Prosecution | | | Education | University of Alabama, J.D., magna cum laude, 1993, Auburn University, B.S.E.E., cum laude, 1988 | | | Admitted | 1993, Georgia; 1995, Alabama; registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Memberships | Atlanta Bar Association (Member, Intellectual Property Committee); State Bar of Georgia (Former Chair, Intellectual Property Law Section); American Intellectual Property Law Association; Lawyers Club of Atlanta. | | | Born | Huntsville, Alabama, June 26, 1965 | | | Biography | Member: Association of University Technology Managers; Licensing Executives Society; Corporate IP Management Committee, Intellectual Property Owners Association; Association of University Technology Managers. Intellectual Property Editor, Electronic Banking Law and Commerce Report. Named, "National Leader in Intellectual Property," Chambers USA, America's Leading Business Lawyers, 2007 and 2008. Listed: "Georgia's Legal Elite" in Intellectual Property, Georgia Trend magazine, 2007; "Georgia Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property, Peers in the State Bar of Georgia, 2008. | | | ISLN | 900654419 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Federal Circuit: Medical Treatment and Diagnostic Method Claims Are PatentableWilliam L. Warren, Malvern (Griff) U. Griffin, Christopher J. Chan, Joshua D. Curry, October 8, 2009 In advance of the U.S. Supreme Court's review of In re Bilski, the Federal Circuit recently held in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services that patent claims directed to medical treatment and diagnostic methods were patentable subject matter because they transformed the human...
Steps of Method Claims Are Not Exportable "Components" under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)Malvern (Griff) U. Griffin, Jason V. Chang, September 3, 2009 Title 35 U.S.C. § 271(f) was enacted by the U.S. Congress to close a loophole that would otherwise allow an infringer to avoid infringement by exporting "components" of a patented invention from the United States to a foreign country for later assembly. The language of § 271(f) provides...
|
|
|