- Appeal and Review
- Class Actions
- Securities Litigation
- Corporate Commercial Litigation and Arbitration
- Public Law Litigation and Arbitration
|University ||University of Toronto, B.A., History, Hons., with High Distinction, 2003|
|Law School||University of Toronto, J.D., with Honours, 2006|
•Member, Canadian Bar Association
•Member, Ontario Bar Association
Margot Finley is an associate in the Toronto office of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP and a member of the Commercial Litigation Group. Margot practises civil litigation, with an emphasis on commercial disputes; directors' and officers' liability; broker liability; shareholder, oppression and other corporate disputes; class actions; and constitutional and administrative law issues, as well as securities regulation, including proceedings before the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and disciplinary proceedings.
Margot served as law clerk to the Justices of the Court of Appeal for Ontario prior to joining BLG as an associate in 2007.
• Represented Parrish & Heimbecker in successfully setting aside a shareholder's rights plan before the OSC.
• Represented one of the fund companies in a securities class action with respect to alleged market timing activities.
• Acted for a number of institutional shareholders before the OSC and the court in opposing Magna's proposal to eliminate its dual class share structure.
• Represented a securities dealer in a regulatory investigation of asset-backed commercial paper.
• Represented an intervenor in an appeal considering whether a witness may wear a niqab while testifying in a sexual assault case.
Publications & Presentations
• Co-Author, "Strategy for Defendants Facing a Leave Motion to Commence a Class Action Under the Securities Act," The Canadian Class Action Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, May 2013 (with David Di Paolo).
• Author, "Assumed Jurisdiction in the Post- Van Breda Era," The Advocates' Quarterly, Autumn 2012 (with Ira Nishisato).
• Author, "IIROC Proposed Rules Changes," Brokers' Report, July 2012.
• Author, "Underwriter Due Diligence," Brokers' Report, February 2011.
• Author, "Proposed Canadian Securities Act - The Enforcement Provisions," Brokers' Report, May 2010 (with Caitlin Sainsbury).
• Author, " R. v. Bryan: The Supreme Court and the Electoral Process," (2008) 42 SCLR 63 (with Christopher D. Bredt).
• Author, "Limiting Section 15(1) in the Health Care Context: The Impact of Auton v. British Columbia," (2005) 63 University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 213.
Rankings & Recognitions
• Received 2011 Lexpert Zenith Award for Corporate Social Responsibility, Pro Bono Team or Firm.
• Member, Canadian Bar Association
• Member, Ontario Bar Association
|Reported Cases||Representative Work; Represented Parrish & Heimbecker in successfully setting aside a shareholder's rights plan before the OSC. Represented one of the fund companies in a securities class action with respect to alleged market timing activities. Acted for a number of institutional shareholders before the OSC and the court in opposing Magna's proposal to eliminate its dual class share structure. Represented a securities dealer in a regulatory investigation of asset-backed commercial paper. Represented an intervenor in an appeal considering whether a witness may wear a niqab while testifying in a sexual assault case.|
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Canada’s Absolute Criminal Prohibition On Physician Assisted Death Is Unconstitutional
Duncan A.W. Ault,Christopher D. Bredt,Margot Finley,Angus M. Gunn, March 13, 2015
The Supreme Court of Canada has pronounced its long-awaited judgment in the Carter proceedings that tested the constitutionality of Canada’s absolute criminal prohibition on physician assisted death. The Court held that section 241(b) and section 14 of the Criminal Code unjustifiably infringe...
Union Carbide v. Bombardier: Confidentiality of Settlement Communications
Margot Finley, May 30, 2014
A decision of the Supreme Court of Canada released on May 8, 2014 has clarified that a confidentiality clause in a mediation contract will not restrict a party from producing evidence of communications made in the mediation context in order to prove the terms of the settlement, unless that is the...
|Profile Visibility |
|#578 in weekly profile views out of 17,547 lawyers in Toronto, Ontario|
|#36,959 in weekly profile views out of 1,691,864 total lawyers Overall|