martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Mark D. Colley Document Search Results (4) Sort by:  | Government Contractors Can Invoke Lanham Act to Stop Competitors’ False Statements
Mark D. Colley, Nicholas M. DePalma, Craig A. Holman, Randall K. Miller; Arnold & Porter LLP;
Legal Alert/Article January 5, 2012, previously published on January 2012 Competition is often fierce between government contractors bidding for work. When a competitor makes a false or misleading promotional statement—in a bid proposal, airport billboard, or even an email—one option for the disadvantaged party is a Lanham Act lawsuit, both to stop misleading...
| | SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure for Publicly Traded Contacts Companies, Including Government Contractors
Richard E. Baltz, Caitlin Keegan Cloonan, Mark D. Colley, Ronald D. Lee, Alexandra Mitter, Nicholas L. Townsend; Arnold & Porter LLP;
Legal Alert/Article November 3, 2011, previously published on November 2011 In May 2011, prompted by recent high-profile data security breaches in the public and private sectors, several senators led by Senate Commerce Chairman Jay Rockefeller, IV (D-WV) requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) develop and publish interpretive guidance clarifying...
| | GAO Declares Expanded Jurisdiction Over Protests of Civilian Task Orders
Emma Broomfield, Mark D. Colley; Arnold & Porter LLP;
Legal Alert/Article June 20, 2011, previously published on June 2011 The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) has ruled that it now has authority over protests challenging civilian agency task and delivery orders issued under multiple-award indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts, regardless of the task order’s value. This ruling creates...
| | Supreme Court Interprets Bayh-Dole Act to Affirm Inventors’ Rights
Mark D. Colley, Craig A. Holman, David R. Marsh, Kristen R. Riemenschneider, Amy F. Ryan; Arnold & Porter LLP;
Legal Alert/Article June 10, 2011, previously published on June 2011 The Supreme Court’s June 6, 2011 decision in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. addressed whether a research institution’s use of federal funding, thereby implicating the Bayh-Dole Act, displaces the traditional US patent law...
|
|