|
Mark E. SwirbalusPartner
Day Pitney LLP One International Place Boston, Massachusetts
02110 (Suffolk Co.)
Telephone: 617-345-4753 Fax: 617-345-4745 http://www.daypitney.com
|
Profile Visibility  | | #2,450 in weekly profile views out of 12,337 lawyers in Boston, Massachusetts | | #190,627 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Probate Controversies; Probate Litigation; Estate Litigation; Contested Trusts and Estates; Fiduciary Litigation; Trust Litigation | | | Education | Boston College Law School, J.D., 1995, Dartmouth College, B.A., 1991 | | | Admitted | 1995, New Hampshire, U.S. District Court, District of New Hampshire and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Hampshire; 1996, Massachusetts, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Massachusetts and U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit | |
| Memberships | Boston (Member: Fiduciary Litigation Committee, Trusts and Estates Section; Business Litigation Committee, Litigation Section), Massachusetts (Member: Probate Litigation Practice Group, Probate Law Section) and New Hampshire Bar Associations; Dartmouth Lawyers Association. | | | Biography | Alumni Enrollment Volunteer, Dartmouth College. | | | ISLN | 910093024 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
D'Ambrosio v. Milgroom
Mark E. Swirbalus, November 18, 2009 Three decisions issued last week by the Appeals Court pursuant to Rule 1:28 are worth mentioning.
Greene v. MullarkeyMark E. Swirbalus, September 13, 2009 In Greene v. Mullarkey, Case No. 07-30561-HJB, Adversary Proceeding No. 08-03009, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2191 (Bankr. D. Mass. Aug. 13, 2009), Christine Greene, her brother Matthew Mullarkey, and his wife Nicole Mullarkey were entangled in what the Bankruptcy Court described as an intra-family feud. The...
Pantazis v. TsouridesMark E. Swirbalus, September 13, 2009 Pantazis v. Tsourides, Case No. 99-2362-C, 2009 Mass. Super. LEXIS 210 (Worcester Super. Ct. July 8, 2009), is a recently-reported superior court decision addressing alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and self-dealing by the defendant trustees. One of the trustees is alleged to have destroyed trust...
|
|
|