Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. Philadelphia, PA Document Search Results (32)

 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLDoes Pennsylvania’s Act 86 Require an Insurer to Provide Notice to an Insured Before Policy Expiration?
Jane Ennis Kane; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
November 25, 2015, previously published on December 1, 2015
Recently, the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment to an insurer and its agent in an action by a former insured seeking coverage for a fire loss under a commercial property insurance policy because the policy expired before the loss occurred, and the policy was not renewed....

 

HTMLImmunity from Testimony Under the Workers’ Compensation Act
Robin M. Romano; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
November 25, 2015, previously published on December 1, 2015
As a rule of thumb, all parties and witnesses to a Pennsylvania workers’ compensation action can testify. There are, however, certain circumstances where a potential witness may possess immunity from testifying under the Act.

 

HTMLBonds May Be the Next Wave of FINRA Claims
Denis C. Dice; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
November 25, 2015, previously published on December 1, 2015
Interest rates have been at an all time low for approximately the last nine years. The Federal Reserve has artificially reduced interest rates in an effort to stimulate the economy and provide additional liquidity. In addition, the stock market has been in a bull market since March of 2009. This...

 

HTMLAre Your Rights Reserved?
Margaret M. Jenks; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 14, 2015, previously published on September 1, 2015
On April 15, 2015, in the case of Erie Ins Exch. v. Lobenthal, 114 A.3d 832 (Pa. Super. 2015), the Pennsylvania Superior Court addressed the validity of a reservation of rights letter issued by the insurer. The Superior Court found that two separate reservation of rights letters were both...

 

HTMLYou Have The Right to An Attorney But Not Additional Time: Examining the Role of An Unrepresented Claimant in the Workers’ Compensation Proceeding
Ashley S. Talley; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 14, 2015, previously published on September 1, 2015
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently held that a claimant is not afforded additional time based upon her unrepresented status alone. In Deborah Roundtree v. WCAB (City of Philadelphia), 2015 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 203 (Pa.Commw. May 8, 2015), the claimant was employed as a forensic technician...

 

HTMLBack to the Drawing Board: The Use of Ethnicity-Based Statistics to Determine Economic Loss in Tort Cases Held Unconstitutional
John J. Hare; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 13, 2015, previously published on August 12, 2015
In a significant ruling issued on July 30, 2015, U.S. Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York held that it is unconstitutional to use ethnicity-based statistics to calculate future economic loss in tort cases. This ruling will likely spawn similar rulings and arguments...

 

HTMLPennsylvania Supreme Court Holds That an Insurer Defending Under a Reservation of Rights Must Reimburse an Insured for an Unconsented-To Settlement So Long as the Settled Claim Is Covered and the Settlement Is Fair and Reasonable
John J. Hare, R. Bruce Morrison; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 5, 2015, previously published on July 23, 2015
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled in a 3-2 decision that an insurer defending under a reservation of rights must reimburse an insured for a tort settlement paid by the insured, despite the insurer’s lack of consent to the settlement, if the claim is covered by the policy and the...

 

HTMLSummary Judgment Reversed on Plaintiff's Jones Act Claims
Timothy D. Rau; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 16, 2015, previously published on July 16, 2015
The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed orders from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Arco and Sunoco on the basis that evidence existed that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos aboard vessels operated by the defendants and that the plaintiff...

 

HTMLSuperior Court Rules Tincher Applies to Failure to Warn Cases
Timothy D. Rau; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 16, 2015, previously published on July 16, 2015
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently issued an opinion deciding a number of issues in the consolidated appeal of Amato v. Crane/Vinciguerra v. Crane, 2015 PA Super. 83. The cases were appeals from jury verdicts of $2.5 million and $2.3 million that were tried in Philadelphia in February 2013...

 

HTMLFederal Judge Applies "Bare Metal Defense" Under PA Law
Joshua D. Scheets; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
July 16, 2015, previously published on July 16, 2015
Judge Eduardo Robreno of the USDC for EDPA issued a thorough and searching analysis of the applicability of what has been termed the "bare metal defense" under Pennsylvania law and predicted how Pennsylvania courts would determine this issue in the current absence of appellate authority...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  Next