martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin Philadelphia, PA Document Search Results (5) Sort by:  | New Third Circuit Decision Limiting Taxable Costs for E-Discovery in Federal Court
John J. Hare; Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin;
Legal Alert/Article March 29, 2012, previously published on March 27, 2012 The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has handed down an important decision clarifying-and sharply limiting-the costs for electronic discovery that may be taxed against a losing party. In Race Tires America, Inc. et al., v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5511 (3d Cir., March 16,...
| | Clarifying Qualifications Necessary To Provide A Written Statement In Support Of A Certificate Of Merit
Elizabeth A. Underwood; Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin;
Legal Alert/Article December 27, 2011, previously published on December 2011 A recent Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas decision Fallon v. Hahnemann Hosp. Univ. Medivac, 2011 Phila. Ct. Com. Pl. LEXIS 166 (July 7, 2011) addresses who may qualify as an appropriate licensed professional for the purposes of submitting a certificate of merit in a medical malpractice claim. In...
| | No Special Exception to PA Statute of Repose for Asbestos Exposure
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin;
Legal Alert/Article September 21, 2011, previously published on September 11, 2011 The Pennsylvania Superior Court was asked to carve out a special exception to Pennsylvania's statute of repose, 42 Pa. C.S.A. Sec. 5536, for plaintiffs who claim exposure to asbestos as a result of improvements to real property protected by the statute. The court refused to allow such an exception...
| | It's Confirmed (Or, Rather, Affirmed): In Pennsylvania, the Truth Shall Set You Free
Gregory W. Fox; Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin;
Legal Alert/Article September 20, 2011, previously published on September 11, 2011 "The truth shall set you free." It's an age-old, well-known phrase. And now it's a part of Pennsylvania law, too, at least with regard to the tort of intentional interference with contractual relations (also known as tortious interference). In Walnut Street Associates v. Brokers Concepts,...
| | FINRA to Adopt New Discovery Rules on an Accelerated Basis: How the Burden on Defending Parties Is Soon To Increase
Joel Wertman; Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin;
Legal Alert/Article September 20, 2011, previously published on September 11, 2011 Providing useful guidance as to the parameters of permissible discovery in public customer arbitrations has been an ongoing task for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") for more than a decade. The scope of permissible discovery has been a topic of renewed discussion over...
|
|