Legal Articles: Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 130


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLFINRA Presents Bond Disclosure Revisions for Public Comment
Terrance A. Bostic, Jeffrey J. Chomko, Samuel E. Cohen, Andrew W. Davitt, Denis C. Dice; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 9, 2015, previously published on March 20, 2015
In an effort to increase transparency about potentially hidden markups in bond transactions, FINRA proposed potential rule revisions for public comment. The proposed rule changes, a companion to an almost identical proposal put forth by the MSRB covering municipal bonds, require bond dealers in...

 

HTMLWall Street and FINRA at Odds Over FINRA’S Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System
Terrance A. Bostic, Jeffrey J. Chomko, Samuel E. Cohen, Andrew W. Davitt, Denis C. Dice; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 9, 2015, previously published on March 20, 2015
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a Wall Street lobbying group, has joined in the criticism of FINRA’s announced Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System (CARDS). In a 63-page letter, the group criticized the proposed CARDS program for the projected cost of...

 

HTMLLegal Updates for Coverage and Bad Faith
Alison L. Krupp; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 19, 2015, previously published on February 26, 2015
Motion for summary judgment on stacking issue denied where policy number for the policy in effect at the time of the accident was different than the policy number for the policy in effect at inception.

 

HTMLLegal Updates for Toxic Torts Litigation
Timothy D. Rau, Joshua D. Scheets, Carol A. VanderWoude; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 19, 2015, previously published on January 29, 2015
En Banc PA Superior Court Vacates $14.5 Million Asbestos Verdict and Remands for New Trial

 

Adobe PDFNew Mexico Court of Appeals Leads the Nation in Approving Medical Marijuana in Workers’ Compensation Cases
Francis X. Wickersham; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on January 29, 2015
On January 13, 2015, the New Mexico Court of Appeals issued an opinion finding medical marijuana to be reasonable and necessary medical care for a workers’ compensation claimant. This opinion follows a decision issued by the same court on May 19, 2014, ruling that medical marijuana was...

 

HTMLLegal Update for Securities
Terrance A. Bostic, Jeffrey J. Chomko, Samuel E. Cohen, Andrew W. Davitt, Denis C. Dice; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 18, 2015, previously published on March 20, 2015
In a recent FINRA arbitration, Stanley Abel v. Janney Montgomery Scott, FINRA Arbitration No. 14-00018, Sam Cohen (Philadelphia, PA) obtained a directed verdict on behalf of his clients, Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, and its registered representative. The claimant, a public customer, as well as a...

 

HTMLRecent New Jersey Case Law on Environmental Claims
Lila Wynne; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 10, 2015, previously published on March 1, 2015
In Morristown Assoc. v. Grant Oil Co., 2015 N.J. LEXIS 50 (N.J. Jan. 26, 2015) the issue on appeal was whether the general six-year statute of limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 applies to private claims for contribution made pursuant to the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act...

 

HTMLA New Product Liability Paradigm
John J. Hare, Keith D. Heinold; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 10, 2015, previously published on March 1, 2015
After years of waiting, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court finally decided in November 2014 what the product liability law in Pennsylvania would look like. In Tincher v. Omega Flex, the issue was straightforward —would Pennsylvania adopt the Third Restatement of Torts as it relates to product...

 

HTMLDealing with Unidentified/Identified Agents Not Named as Defendants in a Complaint
Joseph L. Hoynoski; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 10, 2015, previously published on March 1, 2015
A trend we are seeing in medical malpractice cases is that plaintiffs are naming hospitals as the sole defendant in their complaints. The plaintiff will then allege that the hospital is vicariously liable for anyone and everyone who provided medical care during his or her admission or admissions....

 

HTMLIntentional Act Exclusions & the Doctrine of Inferred Intent in Ohio
David J. Oberly; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 10, 2015, previously published on March 1, 2015
In Allstate Insurance Company v. Campbell, 942 N.E.2d 1090 (Ohio 2010), the Ohio Supreme Court clarified Ohio law regarding coverage for intentional acts. In that case, the court held that the inferred intent doctrine invokes an insurance policy’s intentional act exclusion when the...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>