Legal Articles: Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 111


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLReturning To Regular-Duty Work With Restrictions Entitles One To Presumption Of Causation When Filing Reinstatement Petition; Reinstatement Is Right Even In If Discharged From Employment, Unless employer can establish claimant committed bad faith.
Francis X. Wickersham; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 16, 2015, previously published on January 6, 2015
The claimant suffered an injury to his Achilles tendon in January of 2009 and returned to his pre-injury job in June of 2009 with restrictions. In April of 2010, the employer eliminated the claimant¿s position, and the claimant was transferred to another position without a loss in pay. The new job...

 

HTMLAn Employer May Take an Offset against Workers¿ Compensation Benefits under Section 204 (a) for pension benefits funded by its wholly owned subsidiary.
Francis X. Wickershamn; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 16, 2015, previously published on January 6, 2015
While the claimant was working for Company “A,” it was acquired by Company “B” as a wholly owned subsidiary. All employees of Company “B”‘s subsidiaries were covered by the same workers’ compensation policy as Company “A.” The claimant...

 

Adobe PDFLegislation Imposing Limits on Direct Dispensing of Medications to Injured Workers by Physicians Becomes Law in Pennsylvania
Francis X., Esq. Wickersham; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
November 15, 2014, previously published on November 3, 2014
On October 27th, Governor Tom Corbett signed into law House Bill 1846, which will limit the practice of physicians dispensing drugs directly to injured workers. A recent front page article in The Philadelphia Inquirer by Don Saptkin highlighted the significant costs Pennsylvania employers were...

 

HTMLPA Superior Court Affirms Motions for Summary Judgment on Asbestos Product ID Facts
Timothy D. Rau; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 31, 2014, previously published on October 24, 2014
In a lengthy 70-page precedential opinion issued on October 22, 2014, the Superior Court reviewed the facts against six defendants under PA's standard for summary judgment on the issue of product identification in asbestos cases and held that the trial court properly ruled on each motion. In Krauss...

 

HTMLPhilly Jury Finds Asbestos Did Not Cause Colon Cancer
Timothy D. Rau; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 31, 2014, previously published on October 24, 2014
In the case of Barbara Goll, Executrix of the Estate of Louis T. Goll, III v. Ace Hardware Corp., Philadelphia County, C.C.P., October Term 2011, No. 3406, plaintiff alleged that her deceased husband, Louis Goll, contracted colon cancer and died at the age of 59 as a result of exposure to asbestos....

 

HTMLPremises Owners Not Liable for "Take Home Exposures" Under PA Law
Timothy D. Rau; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 31, 2014, previously published on October 24, 2014
In what was ruled to be an issue of first impression under Pennsylvania law, Judge Eduardo Robreno of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that a premises owner has no duty to an employee's spouse to protect the spouse from exposure to asbestos in the context of...

 

HTMLOhio Court Affirms Admissibility of Evidence that Hodgkin’s Lymphoma May Be Caused by Asbestos
Timothy D. Rau; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 31, 2014, previously published on October 24, 2014
The Ohio Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court decision which allowed plaintiff to present expert testimony that Hodgkin’s Lymphoma may be caused by exposure to asbestos. In the case of Walker v. Ford Motor Co., 2014-Ohio-4208, the Ohio Court of Appeals was asked by defendant Ford...

 

HTMLInterpreting the Definition of “Employment” Under N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 of the Act in the Context of Off-Premises Employment.
Dario J. Badalamenti; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 3, 2014, previously published on October 1, 2014
The petitioner, a school bus aide, filed a claim with the Division of Workers’ Compensation seeking medical and indemnity benefits after she was injured while stepping from the school bus. The respondent denied that the petitioner’s accident arose out of and in the course of her...

 

HTMLComparing Apples to Oranges
Sarah B. Cole; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
September 30, 2014, previously published on September 1, 2014
What is an “underinsured” motor vehicle in Delaware? Up until a short time ago, if all applicable policies of bodily injury liability coverage available totaled less than the amount of the claimant’s own uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, that claimant would be deemed...

 

HTMLSupreme Court’s Halliburton Ruling May Be A Curse in Disguise for Securities Defendants
Gregory P. Graham; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
September 30, 2014, previously published on September 1, 2014
On June 23, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its anticipated decision in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 2398 (2014). Although pre-decision discussion speculated that the case might become the most important securities decision in years, the Court ultimately chose a...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>