Legal Articles: Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 74


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLNLRB Decision on "Joint Employer" Status of Firm and its Staffing Agency May Leave Employers Vulnerable to Liabilities
G. Jay Habas; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 22, 2015, previously published on October 9, 2015
Many employers use staffing agencies to fill their needs for temporary workers. The advantages to the employer include that it can meet fluctuating employee needs without having to hire workers on its own; the temporary agency does the job of recruiting, selecting, training and, in most cases,...

 

HTMLSuperior Court and Division of WC have concurrent jurisdiction to resolve a dispute of a worker's employment status when plaintiff files a complaint only in the Superior Court
Dario J. Badalamenti; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 22, 2015, previously published on October 2, 2015
The decedent was hired to live with the defendant to care for him and was paid in cash. While waiting on a sidewalk while the defendant parked his car, the defendant accidentally struck the decedent, killing her. The estate filed a wrongful death action against the defendant in Superior Court. The...

 

HTMLNJ Supreme Court Reaffirms Limitations of "Mode of Operation" Doctrine
Gregory D. Speier; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 15, 2015, previously published on October 1, 2015
In a significant ruling that will impact how premises liability cases are litigated throughout the state, the New Jersey Supreme Court, on September 28, 2015, unanimously reaffirmed the limitations of ‘Mode of Operation’ applicability.

 

Adobe PDFIREs - A Divided Court Changes The Landscape
Francis X. Wickersham; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
September 28, 2015, previously published on September 23, 2015
A divided Commonwealth Court holds that use of the 5th and 6th Editions of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment is unconstitutional and, therefore, IREs performed under §306 (a.2) must use the 4th Edition Guides

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8