Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Mayer Brown LLP Los Angeles, CA Document Search Results (7)

 

Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLNinth Circuit: No-Rehire Clause in Settlement Agreements May Be Unlawful Restraint of Trade
Andrea M. Weiss, Ruth Zadikany, Lori A. Zahalka; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 4, 2015, previously published on April 29, 2015
Decision: In Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a no-rehire clause in a settlement agreement violated California’s broad prohibition on restrictive covenants (Business & Professions Code section 16600). In Golden, an...

 

HTMLUS Securities and Exchange Commission Announces First Whistleblower Protection Case Involving Restrictive Language in Confidentiality Agreements
Dana S. Douglas, Marcia E. Goodman, Matthew A. Rossi, Gina T. Saviola; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 16, 2015, previously published on April 6, 2015
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) has announced its first enforcement action against a company for using restrictive language in confidentiality agreements, resulting in a Cease and Desist Order by consent that removed language that the SEC asserted could stifle the...

 

HTMLNLRB Holds that Employees Have Right To Use Employers’ Email Systems for Non-Work Purposes
Ruth Zadikany, Lori A. Zahalka; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 7, 2015, previously published on January 28, 2015
Decision: In Purple Communications, the NLRB recently held in a 3-2 decision that employees have the right to use their employers’ email systems during non-work time for non-work purposes, including for the purpose of union organizing. Noting that “the use of email as a common form of...

 

HTMLCalifornia Appellate Court Upholds On-Duty Rest Periods
Ruth Zadikany, Lori A. Zahalka; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 7, 2015, previously published on January 28, 2015
Decision: In Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc., a California Court of Appeal reversed a $94 million judgment in a wage-and-hour class action, rejecting the plaintiffs’ theory that the company violated wage-and-hour laws by requiring some employees to remain “on call” and...

 

HTMLNinth Circuit Upholds Substantial Punitive Damages Award in Sexual Harassment Case Despite Award of Nominal Compensatory Damages
Ruth Zadikany, Lori A. Zahalka; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 7, 2015, previously published on January 28, 2015
Decision: In State of Arizona v. Asarco, an en banc Ninth Circuit panel held that a $300,000 punitive damages verdict in a sexual harassment case in which only nominal damages were awarded comported with due process. The plaintiffs in the underlying case successfully established liability for...

 

HTMLCalifornia Court Extends Whistleblower Protections to “Perceived Whistleblowers”
Ruth Zadikany, Lori A. Zahalka; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 26, 2015, previously published on December 19, 2014
Decision: In Diego v. Pilgrim United Church of Christ, a preschool employee alleged she was wrongfully terminated from her employment in violation of public policy as a result of the school director’s mistaken belief that she had lodged a complaint with the Department of Social Services,...

 

HTMLUS Supreme Court Rules Employers Do Not Need to Pay Employees For Post-Shift Time in Security Lines
Maritoni D. Kane, Andrew S. Rosenman, Ruth Zadikany, John Zaimes; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 26, 2015, previously published on December 16, 2014
In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the US Supreme Court has ruled that Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not require that employees be compensated for time spent going through (and waiting to go through) security screenings before leaving the workplace.