Cornell University, B.S., Industrial and Labor Relations, 1989
University of California, Hastings College of the Law, J.D., 1992
1992, California (inactive) and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1994, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 1998, U.S. Supreme Court; 2000, Massachusetts and U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts; 2001, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 2002, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois and U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit; 2006, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut; U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit; U.S. District Court, District of Vermont, 2014
Boston (Labor and Employment Law Section), Massachusetts (Labor and Employment Law Section) and American (Vice Chair, Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section) Bar Associations.
Dean's List (Spring 1986, Fall 1986, Fall 1988); National Moot Court Competition (1991); Moot Court Board Member (1991). Member, Industrial Claims Association (1992-2000). Secretary, Operation A.B.L.E. of Greater Boston (2010-2011); Board of Directors, Operation A.B.L.E. of Greater Boston (2006-2011). Author: "Same-Sex Marriage of Civil Unions: 'Til State Borders Do Us Part," The Brief, Vol. 36, No. 3; "Recent Development in Employer-Employee Relations," Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 40. Editor: Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section, Employer-Employee Relations Committee Newsletter, 2005-2007; Barristers Journal, 1996.
Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Attorney General, 798 N.E. 2d 273 (Mass. 2003); Kaytor v. Electric Boat Corp., 2007 WL 4322546 (D. Conn. 2007); Kaytor v. Electric Boat Corp., 2009 WL 840669 (D. Conn. 2009); Kaytor v. Electric Boat Corp., 2009 WL 1580989 (D. Conn. 2009); Kaytor v. Electric Boat Corp., 609 F.3d 537 (2nd Cir. 2010).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com