The Ogletree Building, 300 North Main Street, Suite 500, Greenville, SC
Wofford College, B.A., 1993
University of South Carolina School of Law, J.D., cum laude, 1996
1996, South Carolina
South Carolina Bar.
Columbia, South Carolina, February 2, 1971
Member: Moot Court; Law Review. Adjunct Instructor, Columbia Junior College Paralegal School, 1998-2000. Chairman: Team Spartanburg. Chairman: International Center for the Upstate. Board Member: Greenville Symphony Orchestra. Member, Council of Advisors, Spartanburg Area Chamber of Commerce.
Focused Sys. v. Aerotek, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. Lexis 58979 (D.S.C. 2011); Hughey v. Greenville Health Syst. Univ. Med. Ctr., 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 61966 (2009), 2009 U.S. App. Lexis 25528 (4th Cir. 2009); Ivey v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. Lexis 52971 (D.S.C. 2008); Ford v. McLeod Regional Medical Center, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24509 (D.S.C. 2007); King v. Marriott International, Inc., 2008 U.S. App. Lexis 4420 (4th Cir. 2008), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23854 (D.S.C. 2007); Ramsey v. Vanguard Services, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20670 (D.S.C. 2007); King v. Marriott International, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51652 (D.S.C. 2006); Kinnally v. Marriott International, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45151 (D.S.C. 2006); Trulove v. Hunt, 67 F. Supp 2d (D.S.C. 1999); Peterkin v. Shealy, 1998 S.C. Env. LEXIS 148 (S.C. Adm. L. J. Div. 1998); Town of Silverstreet v. ISE Newberry, Inc., 1998 S.C. Env. LEXIS 51 (S.C. Admin. L. J. Div. 1998); Haley Farms v. Wells, 1998 S.C. Env. LEXIS 154 (S.C. Admin. L. J. Div. 1998); Haley Farms v. Wells, 1997 S.C. Env. LEXIS 109 (S.C. Admin. L. J. Div. 1997).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com