|
Profile Visibility  | | #145 in weekly profile views out of 13,199 lawyers in San Francisco, California | | #10,033 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Education | Case Western Reserve University, J.D., 1992, Harvard University, A.B., 1989 | | | Admitted | 1992, Ohio (inactive); 2001, California; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, U.S. District Court, Eastern, Northern and Southern Districts of California, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Wisconsin, U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth, Sixth and Ninth Circuits | |
| Memberships | State Bar of California. | | | Born | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1967 | | | ISLN | 900515420 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
New Wage and Benefit Requirements for Employees at SFO and LAXAlexandra A. Bodnar, Thomas T. Liu, Charles F. Donley, Michael W. Kelly, July 23, 2009 As of May 31, 2009 airlines operating out of San Francisco International Airport (SFO) must adhere to rigorous health care requirements, with respect to their employees, as set forth by the amended San Francisco Health Care Accountability Ordinance (HCAO).
Supreme Court Rules Collective Bargaining Agreements Requiring Arbitration of Statutory Claims EnforceableTerry M. Billups, Alexandra A. Bodnar, D. Lewis Clark, Norman Davis, Susan M. DiMickele, Susan C. Hastings, Amy Ruth Ita, Michael W. Kelly, Merrell B. Renaud, April 24, 2009 In 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, a divided US Supreme Court held 5-4 that a provision in a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) that clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate claims arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) is enforceable as a matter of...
US Supreme Court Continues to Open the Floodgates for Retaliation Claims under Title VIITara Aschenbrand, Terry M. Billups, Alexandra A. Bodnar, D. Lewis Clark, Norman Davis, Susan C. Hastings, Michael W. Kelly, William A. Nolan, Merrell B. Renaud, Jeffrey J. Wedel, March 9, 2009 On January 26, 2009 the United States Supreme Court issued its latest decision broadening the circumstances under which employees can pursue retaliation claims against their employers under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
|
|
|