|
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Los Angeles, California Office View all offices
Century Plaza Towers, 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1370
Los Angeles, California
90067
(Los Angeles Co.)
Telephone: 310-586-3200
Fax: 310-586-3202
http://www.mintz.com
Profile Visibility  | | #130 in weekly profile views out of 4,003 law firms in Los Angeles, California | | #87 in weekly profile views out of 263,071 total law firms Overall |
|
| | |
Specific Practice & Industry Groups Details: Statement of Practice Summary: General Practice. Antitrust and Trade Regulation, Banking and Financial Services, Bankruptcy and Creditors' Rights, Biotechnology, Communications, Corporate, Energy Project Finance, Employment, Environmental, Federal Legislative and Regulatory Practice, Group Benefits and Executive Compensation, Health Care, High Technology, Higher Education, Immigration, Intellectual Property, International, Internet, Insurance, Labor, Medical Technology and Pharmaceuticals, Municipal Bonds, Non-Profit Organizations, Real Estate, Securities including Initial Public Offerings, State and Local Government Relations, Taxation, Trusts and Estates, Venture Capital. Trial and Appellate Practice including Commercial Transactions, Construction, Corporate, Insurance Litigation, Product Liability, Securities, Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition, Intellectual Property, White Collar Crime and Other Civil and Criminal Litigation. Documents by Lawyers at this office | |
California’s New Wage Theft Protection Act: Happy New Year to California EmployersBrandon T. Willenberg, December 16, 2011 The start of a new year often means new laws for California employers to follow, and new administrative burdens for them to bear. The start of 2012 will be no exception. Effective January 1, 2012, California employers must comply with California’s new Wage Theft Protection Act, Labor Code... The Future of Class Action Suits After Wal-Mart v. DukesNathan R. Hamler,Kevin M. McGinty,Daniel T. Pascucci,Ari N. Stern, June 27, 2011 In a historic decision, the Supreme Court decertified a plaintiff class in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, which asserted claims on behalf of 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees alleging that Wal-Mart discriminated against women on matters of pay and promotion. U.S. Supreme Court Overturns California Rule that Prohibited Waivers of Class Action Relief in Arbitration AgreementsNathan R. Hamler,Kevin M. McGinty,Daniel T. Pascucci, May 2, 2011 On April 27, 2011, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (AT&T Mobility), the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled that federal law preempts California’s so-called Discover Bank rule, which had classified most purported class action waivers in consumer arbitration contracts as... (For complete biographical data on Boston, MA, Washington, DC, Reston, VA, New York, NY, Stamford, CT, Palo Alto and San Diego, CA, London, England and Herzliya, Israel attorneys, see Professional Biographies at Boston, MA, Washington, DC, New York, NY, Stamford, CT, Palo Alto, San Diego and Santa Monica, CA, London, England and Herzliya, Israel).
|
|