Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. San Diego, CA Document Search Results (3)
|USPTO Issues Newly Updated Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility that Further Clarifies Examination Standards under 35 U.S.C. §101 in Light of Alice v. CLS Bank|
Robert T.S. Latta, Matthew D. Show, Michael D. Van Loy; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
August 7, 2015, previously published on August 4, 2015ver the past few years, the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alice (Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014)) and Mayo (Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012)), and other cases relating to subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101...
|Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal on Grounds of Patent Ineligibility|
Monique Winters Macek, Michael D. Van Loy; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
July 8, 2015, previously published on July 1, 2015On June 23, 2015, the Federal Circuit affirmed the finding of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (“District Court”) dismissing the complaints in four related actions for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,707,505 (the ‘505 Patent) on the ground of...
|Fed Circuit Reverses PTAB Decision in IPR Proceeding|
Arun K. Goel, Brad M. Scheller; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
July 3, 2015, previously published on June 22, 2015On June 16, the Federal Circuit issued its first-ever reversal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in an America Invents Act post-grant proceeding. The opinion, drafted by Chief Judge Prost and joined by CAFC Judge Lourie and E.D. Tex. Judge Gilstrap, provides considerable guidance on claim...