martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. San Diego, CA Document Search Results (5) Sort by:  | Privacy-on-the-Go: California Attorney General and Major Mobile Application Platforms Agree to Privacy Principles for Mobile Applications
Cynthia J. Larose, Jake Romero; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article March 14, 2012, previously published on March 12, 2012 Application developers have been put on notice by the State of California. It is time to pay attention to user privacy and collection of information from user devices.
| | What You Need to Get Done Now If You Want to Sell Your Company in 2012
Jeremy D. Glaser, Sebastian E. Lucier, Jake Romero, Melanie D. Ruthrauff, Raj Tanden; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article February 24, 2012, previously published on February 22, 2012 One of today’s most discussed political topics is the expected expiration of the Bush tax cuts after December 31, 2012. If Congress doesn’t act, among other things, the individual U.S. federal income tax rate on long-term capital gains will increase on January 1, 2013 for those earning...
| | California’s New Forced Labor Disclosure Law: Empowering Consumers while Burdening the Supply Chain
Micha "Mitch" Danzig, Eric J. Eastham, Cynthia J. Larose, Benjamin B. Tymann; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article January 9, 2012, previously published on January 6, 2012 California ushered in the New Year with the usual fanfare and revelry. But 2012 also uncorked new state disclosure requirements for retailers and manufacturers concerning the businesses’ efforts to eradicate human trafficking and slave labor from their supply chains.
| | Invention Assignment Following Stanford v. Roche: Implications for Technology Transfer and Government Contracts
Jonathan T. Cain, Richard G. Gervase, David E. Johnson, Muriel M. Liberto, Tali M. Tuchin; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article June 30, 2011, previously published on June 27, 2011 Last week the United States Supreme Court clarified the respective invention ownership rights between federal contractors and their employee-inventors under the Bayh-Dole Act (35 U.S.C. §§201(e), (c), 202(a)) (the “Act”) in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior...
| | The Future of Class Action Suits After Wal-Mart v. Dukes
Nathan R. Hamler, Kevin M. McGinty, Daniel T. Pascucci, Ari N. Stern; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article June 27, 2011, previously published on June 23, 2011 In a historic decision, the Supreme Court decertified a plaintiff class in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, which asserted claims on behalf of 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees alleging that Wal-Mart discriminated against women on matters of pay and promotion.
|
|