Legal Articles: Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 559


View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLMore than Employees Bargained For: Do Union Employees Have a Right to Bargain Over Company Data Breaches?
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky Popeo P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 16, 2015, previously published on February 27, 2015
These days most employers manage a vast amount of electronic information about their employees, including the employees’ personal identifying information. But, what obligations do employers have to unionized employees with respect to managing that information and bargaining with them in the...

 

HTMLOn the Fourth Day of Privacy, My Insurance Carrier Gave to Me.....
Daniel S. Harary, Heidi A. Lawson; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 16, 2015, previously published on December 12, 2014
What can companies and insurers expect in the new year when it comes to cyber liability insurance coverage? While we wait for some court decisions interpreting these new stand-alone cyber liability insurance policies that are being heavily pushed in the market, there are some steps a company can...

 

HTMLAustralia’s Data Protection Office Publishes Guide to “Reasonable Security”
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky Popeo P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 16, 2015, previously published on January 26, 2015
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has published a sensible guide to “reasonable security” that could be a good roadmap for any business coming up to Data Privacy Day, no matter where you are in the world. The Guide sets forth five considerations for the protection of...

 

HTMLObama Administration Anticipates Movement in Doomsday Clock
Scott Hitch, Michelli Rivera; Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky Popeo P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 16, 2015, previously published on January 29, 2015
Last week the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS) moved the minute hand on the Doomsday Clock two minutes closer to midnight. Advancement of the clock hand symbolizes experts’ concerns on the threat of global catastrophe. Kennette Benedict, executive director of the BAS warned that...

 

HTMLConsumer Claims Survive Motion to Dismiss in Target Data Breach Class Action
Kevin M. McGinty; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 16, 2015, previously published on December 29, 2014
A recent ruling by Federal District Judge Paul Magnuson will permit most of the consumer claims in the Target data breach litigation to survive Target’s motion to dismiss. This most recent ruling follows on the heels of the court’s December 2 decision partially denying Target’s...

 

HTMLOn the Third Day of Privacy, the Shareholders Gave to Me......
Megan N. Gates; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 16, 2015, previously published on December 11, 2014
As the holiday season slips into the rear view mirror, another season looms large for public companies - proxy season. Adding to the ever-growing chorus of demands for increased transparency by public companies on cybersecurity and privacy matters, institutional shareholders have recently begun to...

 

HTMLFTC Announces Annual Revision to HSR Jurisdictional Thresholds
Robert G. Kidwell, Helen J. Kim, Farrah Short, Bruce D. Sokler; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 12, 2015, previously published on January 15, 2015
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on January 15, 2015 increased jurisdictional thresholds for premerger notification filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the HSR Act).

 

HTMLDistrict Court Permits Section 2 Claim to Proceed Against Pharmaceutical Manufacturer for Denying Generic Rival Access to Branded Drug Samples
Dionne C. Lomax, Timothy J. Slattery; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 10, 2015, previously published on January 09, 2015
On December 22, 2014, a federal district court in New Jersey found that Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Mylan”) alleged facts sufficient to plead an antitrust claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act against defendant, Celgene Corporation (“Celgene”), for denying a generic...

 

HTMLPatentability of Software Post-Alice: How Do Courts Determine Whether an Idea is Abstract?
Sean Casey, Matthew A. Karambelas, Courtney Quish, Michael T. Renaud; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 10, 2015, previously published on January 12, 2015
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l on patentable subject matter, courts have tried to follow the prescribed framework. Under Alice, patent claims are invalid if directed to “abstract ideas” and if the ordered combination of those abstract...

 

HTMLCarnegie Mellon University v. Marvell: $1.5 Billion at Stake at the Federal Circuit
Michael T. Renaud, Peter F. Snell; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 10, 2015, previously published on January 13, 2015
Currently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is Carnegie Mellon University’s (“CMU”) $1.535 billion judgment for patent infringement against Marvell Technology Group Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively “Marvell”),...

 


View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>