Legal Articles: Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 586


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLCAFC to Rehear Suprema: Disposition Could Have Significant Repercussions for ITC Jurisdiction
Nicholas W. Armington, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on November 26, 2014
On February 5, 2015 the en banc Federal Circuit will hear oral argument in the matter of Suprema, Inc. v. ITC., Case No. 2012-1170 (Fed. Cir.). This rehearing reviews the controversial Federal Circuit opinion holding that “an exclusion order based on a violation of 19 U.S.C. §...

 

HTMLALJ Lord Amends Ground Rules to Permit Reply Briefs
Michael B. Marion, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on November 24, 2014
On November 17, 2014, Administrative Law Judge Dee Lord amended her Ground Rules to permit parties filing motions to file a reply brief without first seeking leave from the ALJ. This presents a significant change in motions practice before ALJ Lord that differentiates her motions practice from the...

 

HTMLIndefiniteness: Are You Reasonably Certain?
Thomas Jackman, Carl A. Kukkonen, Pedro F. Suarez; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on November 21, 2014
The indefiniteness standard has, until recently, been very high—only an “insolubly ambiguous claim” was considered indefinite (see, e.g., Honeywell Intern., Inc. v. International Trade, 341 F. 3d 1332, 1338-9 (Fed. Cir. 2003))—but recent events have made it easier to...

 

HTMLMore GMO Woes: Another Corn Exporter Sues Syngenta for its Failure to Isolate its GMO Corn
Michelle Gillette, Dominique L. Windberg; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 8, 2014
Last month, Archer Daniels Midland Co. (“ADM”) joined a slew of corn exporters and other stakeholders who have sued Syngenta based on allegations that China rejected these exporters’ products because Syngenta’s genetically modified corn seed, which contains a trait that...

 

HTMLApply by January 6 to Pitch Your Energy Start-Up at the ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit
Sahir Surmeli; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 30, 2014
This February, the US Department of Energy will host the fifth annual ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit in Washington, D.C. As part of the proceedings, energy startups will have the opportunity to participate in the Future Energy Pitching Session.

 

HTMLCAFC Finds Patent Claiming Software-Related Invention is Patentable
Sean Casey, Matthew A. Karambelas, Courtney Quish; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 10, 2014
For the first time since the Supreme Court’s Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l decision this past summer, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has found that a patent claiming a software-related invention was patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (with...

 

HTMLHo Ho Ho GMO! The 2014 GMO Legislation Scorecard
Daniel J. Herling, Mina Nasseri; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 23, 2014
This has been a big year for GMO legislation. In 2014 alone, 25 states have proposed 67 pieces of legislation aimed either at the labeling of products containing GMOs or at the ban of GMO-containing crops. While this space has strived to keep you up-to-date with the latest news in the war over...

 

HTMLFed. Circuit: No “Bright Line Rules” For Determining RAND Royalties; Rejects District Court Method of Computing RAND Royalty Rates
Robert J. Moore, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 9, 2014
Courts in the last two years have grappled with what methodology to apply to determine a reasonable royalty rate for infringed patents subject to “Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory,” or “RAND,” encumbrances. On December 4, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit...

 

HTMLFTC and DOJ to Host Second Public Workshop on Health Care Competition
Farrah Short, Bruce D. Sokler; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 26, 2015, previously published on January 26, 2015
Last March, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) began a public workshop series entitled, “Examining Health Care Competition.” On February 24 and 25, 2015, the FTC will physically host the second workshop in this series, co-hosted again by the Antitrust...

 

HTMLInternational Trade Commission Clarifies the Requirements for Standing in a Patent Infringement Investigation at the ITC
Nicholas W. Armington, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 26, 2015, previously published on January 21, 2015
The International Trade Commission (ITC) recently issued an opinion clarifying the requirements for standing in patent infringement suits at the ITC. On January 7, 2015, the Commission issued the public version of its opinion reviewing Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Dee Lord’s initial...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>