Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

Molly Hughes Cherry

Member
Nexsen Pruet, LLC
205 King Street, Suite 400
Charleston, South Carolina 29401
Peer Rating
4.8 of 5.0
Client Rating
N/R
AV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Litigation; Business Disputes; Employment & Labor Law; Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith; Lender Liability; Professional Liability; Credit Unions; Insurance
University
Wofford College, B.A., 1993
Law School
University of South Carolina School of Law, J.D., 1996
Admitted
1996, South Carolina; U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina
ISLN
913134625
Peer Reviews (15)
AV Rated
4.8/5.0
Peer Rating
 
High Ethical Standard
Employment Law, Employment Litigation, Employment Claims, Employment Defense, Litigation, Commercial Litigation and Civil Litigation
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
4.8/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.9/5
Judgment
4.8/5
Communication Ability
4.8/5
Legal Experience
4.8/5
Peer Reviews (15)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 12/03/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 11/30/14
Mrs. Cherry is deserving of an AV rating.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 11/28/14
Ms. Cherry is an extremely capable, talented lawyer. She has a superb legal mind, is an agile and effective trial attorney, and is well respected by other members of the bar.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 11/27/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 11/27/14
Molly Cherry conducts herself with the utmost professionalism and adheres to the highest criteria of ethical standards. She is always a pleasure to have as opposing counsel and provides her clients with the best defense possible.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Member on 09/24/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Government Counsel on 05/04/12
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 12/21/11
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 12/21/11
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 12/14/11
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 12/14/11
Molly is a "go-to" employement litigator in our state.
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Marketing Partner on 12/05/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.6/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 12/14/11
Molly is an exceptional lawyer, respected by bench and bar alike.
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
5.0/5
Communication Ability
5.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
4.2/5.0 Posted by a Member on 11/27/14
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
4.0/5
Judgment
3.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
5.0/5
4.2/5.0 Posted by a Member on 11/27/14
Molly is a very good and well respected civil litigator
Legal Knowledge
4.0/5
Analytical Capabilities
5.0/5
Judgment
4.0/5
Communication Ability
4.0/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.