Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Home > Morris Polich & Purdy LLP > Legal Library

Legal Articles: Morris Polich & Purdy LLP

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 11


View Page: 1  2  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:

Adobe PDFBrinker - An Employer Victory on Meal and Rest Periods
Douglas H. Hoang; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 16, 2012, previously published on April 12, 2012
After a long and arduous road, the Supreme Court has finally issued its opinion in the long awaited case of Brinker v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), S166350. As discussed below, the opinion can be seen as a rare victory for employers in California.

 

Adobe PDFCalifornia Supreme Court Unanimously Finds School District’s Administrative and Supervisory Personnel Owe Protective Duty of Care to Students
Christian A. Carrillo; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 14, 2012, previously published on March 8, 2012
The California Supreme Court held that a school district may be held vicariously liable for its administrative personnel who negligently hire, retain, and supervise an employee who sexually harasses and abuses a student. C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District imposes on school personnel...

 

Adobe PDFComponent Part Supplier Defense Upheld in California Products Liability Case Examination of the Maxton v. Western States Metals, et al. Case
Holiday D. Powell; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 14, 2012, previously published on February 29, 2012
Plaintiff John Maxton worked as a laborer between 1975 and 2007, during which time he used various metal products, including steel and aluminum ingots, sheets, rolls, and tubes, manufactured by the defendants. Maxton claimed that during the course of using these products, in cutting, grinding,...

 

Adobe PDFEvidence of Causation Alone Insufficient to Defeat Summary Judgment
Robert Hernandez; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2012, previously published on February 23, 2012
In a recent products liability case, the California Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for a defendant and held that evidence that a product caused an allergic reaction was insufficient by itself to establish the existence of a product defect. In Hennigan v. White (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th...

 

Adobe PDFNew Legislation Regarding Use of Credit Reports in Employment
Matthew T. Kramer; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 23, 2012, previously published on February 22, 2012
On October 9, 2011, California Governor Jerry Brown signed almost two dozen new California human resources and labor-related bills into law, effective in 2012. One of the new bills, AB-22, deals with prohibiting the use of credit reports in employment. This legislation prohibits employers from...

 

HTMLMPP Obtains Dismissal in Clinical Trial Case
Matthew L. Marshall; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 23, 2012, previously published on February 9, 2012
The Superior Court of California recently held that a sponsor of a Phase I clinical trial could not be held liable by a trial participant for injuries that she allegedly sustained as a result of a medical procedure conducted on her during the trial, effectively ending the case against the sponsor.

 

Adobe PDFCyberbullying Legislation
Matthew T. Kramer; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 23, 2012, previously published on February 22, 2012
Cyberbullying is a serious matter, as evidenced by the recent stories of teenagers who have taken their own lives after being victims of cyberbullies. Despite these tragic events, courts have failed to clarify the extent of a school administrator’s authority to discipline students for...

 

Adobe PDFFatal and Sanctionable: Filing an Untimely Anti-SLAPP Motion
Jens B. Koepke; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 23, 2012, previously published on February 21, 2012
Not only can filing an anti-SLAPP motion more than 60 days after service of the complaint kill your motion, it might even result in sanctions against you. A recent state appellate court decision appears to sharpen the teeth in the 60-day filing requirement in Section 425.16(f).

 

Adobe PDFThe Supreme Court’s Refusal to Hear Cyberbullying Cases Leaves Law Unclear
Christian A. Carrillo; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 23, 2012, previously published on February 22, 2012
On January 17, 2012, the United States Supreme Court, without comment, denied review to three cases. In doing so, the Supreme Court let stand two rulings that allowed lawsuits to proceed against school districts which had disciplined students for social media-related acts that targeted principals...

 

Adobe PDFHarris v. Superior Court
Matthew T. Kramer; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 23, 2012, previously published on February 22, 2012
Claims adjusters still do not have a definitive answer to the question of whether they are exempt or non-exempt employees entitled to overtime compensation. The California Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Harris v. Superior Court, an overtime pay case that addresses whether certain...

 


View Page: 1  2  Next