Morris Polich & Purdy LLP

 – Firm Profile

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP Law Firm Logo

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP 

Size of Organization: 94
Year Established: 1969
Web Site:

Telephone: 213-891-9100
Facsimile: 213-488-1178

Profile Visibility
#258 in weekly profile views out of 281,071 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP is a law firm that works with its clients on a national basis. We represent clients in every state, as well as many U.S. possessions. We also have a wealth of international affiliations.

Our dedication to clients, combined with extensive experience, both in the trial and appellate courts, are the qualities that distinguish us from other law firms. Our attorneys are known for their vast experience and success. We provide superior legal services in a manner consistent with our clients' best interests and goals. We are committed to expertise in all our areas of practice, knowing our clients' businesses and providing client service at its highest level.

Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP:
Toxic Torts (62 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP: 28

Documents by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP on

Subscribe to this feed

Appellate Court Endorses Averaging To Determine If Exposures Require Prop 65 Warning
Christopher G. Foster, May 21, 2015
In 2011, the Environmental Law Foundation (ELF) filed a complaint against Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and 15 other food manufacturers, alleging that the lead content of defendants’ products was sufficient to trigger the duty pursuant to Proposition 65 to provide warnings to consumers. The...

California Court of Appeal Upholds Proposed Sacramento Kings Stadium Over CEQA Challenge
Hubert T. Lee, May 21, 2015
On February 18, 2015, California’s Third District Court of Appeal in Saltonstall et al. v. City of Sacramento upheld the City of Sacramento’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the proposed construction of the new Sacramento Kings’ basketball stadium in downtown...

California Court of Appeals Dismisses Petitioner’s Challenge to RWQCB’s California Court of Appeals Dismisses Petitioner’s Challenge to RWQCB’s TMDL Standards
Hubert T. Lee, May 21, 2015
On March 30, 2015, the Second District Court of Appeal in Conway v. State Water Resources Control Board rejected claims that the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) impermissibly established Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for McGrath Lake when it set TMDLs in terms of pollutant...


Complete a Client Review

Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.