Morris Polich & Purdy LLP
Size of Organization: 75 Year Established: 1969 Web Site: http://www.mpplaw.com
Telephone: 213-891-9100
Facsimile: 213-488-1178
| |
Profile Visibility 
#222 in weekly profile views out of 264,196 total law firms Overall |
|
|
|
|
Morris Polich & Purdy LLP is a law firm that works with its clients on a national basis. We represent clients in every state, as well as many U.S. possessions. We also have a wealth of international affiliations.
Our dedication to clients, combined with extensive experience, both in the trial and appellate courts, are the qualities that distinguish us from other law firms. Our attorneys are known for their vast experience and success. We provide superior legal services in a manner consistent with our clients' best interests and goals. We are committed to expertise in all our areas of practice, knowing our clients' businesses and providing client service at its highest level.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP:
Toxic Torts (62 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP:
26
Documents by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP on Martindale.com
| |
Brinker - An Employer Victory on Meal and Rest PeriodsDouglas H. Hoang, April 16, 2012
After a long and arduous road, the Supreme Court has finally issued its opinion in the long awaited case of Brinker v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), S166350. As discussed below, the opinion can be seen as a rare victory for employers in California.
Component Part Supplier Defense Upheld in California Products Liability Case Examination of the Maxton v. Western States Metals, et al. CaseHoliday D. Powell, March 14, 2012
Plaintiff John Maxton worked as a laborer between 1975 and 2007, during which time he used various metal products, including steel and aluminum ingots, sheets, rolls, and tubes, manufactured by the defendants. Maxton claimed that during the course of using these products, in cutting, grinding,...