Morris Polich & Purdy LLP

 – Firm Profile
 




Morris Polich & Purdy LLP Law Firm Logo

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP 

Size of Organization: 94
Year Established: 1969
Web Site: http://www.mpplaw.com

Telephone: 213-891-9100
Facsimile: 213-488-1178

Profile Visibility
#61 in weekly profile views out of 283,509 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


Morris Polich & Purdy LLP is a law firm that works with its clients on a national basis. We represent clients in every state, as well as many U.S. possessions. We also have a wealth of international affiliations.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP:
Toxic Torts (62 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP: 22


Documents by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

California Supreme Court Holds That CEQA Analysis Is a One Way Street... Generally
Christopher G. Foster, February 29, 2016
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies to conduct appropriate environmental review of discretionary projects they carry out or approve and to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for any project that may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA is...

Insurer’s Liability For Breach of Contract Not Capped By Policy Limits
John S. Na, February 29, 2016
A federal district court in Nevada held that the measure of damages for breach of contract is not only the amount expected to be paid under the contract (i.e. the policy limit), but also, all consequential damages that are reasonably foreseeable from such breach, even if it exceeds policy limits.

Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Over Discharges to Navigable Waters Via Hydrologically Connected Groundwater
Sudhir Lay Burgaard, February 24, 2016
In early January 2016, Duke Energy filed a motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal on the issue of whether the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates discharges from an ash pond hydrologically connected to navigable surface waters via groundwater. Yadkin Riverkeeper Inc. et al. v. Duke Energy...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.