Morris Polich & Purdy LLP

 – Firm Profile

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP Law Firm Logo

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP 

Size of Organization: 94
Year Established: 1969
Web Site:

Telephone: 213-891-9100
Facsimile: 213-488-1178

Profile Visibility
#177 in weekly profile views out of 283,049 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP is a law firm that works with its clients on a national basis. We represent clients in every state, as well as many U.S. possessions. We also have a wealth of international affiliations.

Our dedication to clients, combined with extensive experience, both in the trial and appellate courts, are the qualities that distinguish us from other law firms. Our attorneys are known for their vast experience and success. We provide superior legal services in a manner consistent with our clients' best interests and goals. We are committed to expertise in all our areas of practice, knowing our clients' businesses and providing client service at its highest level.

Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP:
Toxic Torts (62 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP: 28

Documents by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP on

Subscribe to this feed

Appeals Court Can See the Forest for the (Old) Trees
Christopher G. Foster, January 27, 2016
In 1976, the City of Santa Cruz (City) sought to protect its urban forest by adopting the "Heritage Tree Ordinance," which governs the protection of large trees and trees having other significance. The City later adopted the "Heritage Tree Removal Resolution," which governs the...

Dischargers Find No Harbor in the Clean Air Act from State Common Law Claims
Richard E. Stultz, January 27, 2016
On November 2, 2015, citing the Clean Air Act’s (“the Act”) “savings” clause, principles of federalism and analogizing with the Clean Water Act and its case law, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Act does not preempt claims based on a source...

Ninth Circuit Requires EPA to Apply Scientific Studies Supporting Its Actions in Regulating Honeybee Pesticide
Summer L. Nastich, January 27, 2016
The Ninth Circuit gave the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a strong rebuke in relation to the unconditional registration of sulfoxaflor, a pesticide toxic to honeybees, in Pollinator Stewardship Council v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In this case, the Ninth Circuit stated clearly...


Complete a Client Review

Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.