Morris Polich & Purdy LLP

 – Firm Profile

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP Law Firm Logo

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP 

Size of Organization: 94
Year Established: 1969
Web Site:

Telephone: 213-891-9100
Facsimile: 213-488-1178

Profile Visibility
#148 in weekly profile views out of 281,662 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm

Morris Polich & Purdy LLP is a law firm that works with its clients on a national basis. We represent clients in every state, as well as many U.S. possessions. We also have a wealth of international affiliations.

Our dedication to clients, combined with extensive experience, both in the trial and appellate courts, are the qualities that distinguish us from other law firms. Our attorneys are known for their vast experience and success. We provide superior legal services in a manner consistent with our clients' best interests and goals. We are committed to expertise in all our areas of practice, knowing our clients' businesses and providing client service at its highest level.

Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP:
Toxic Torts (62 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP: 29

Documents by Morris Polich & Purdy LLP on

Subscribe to this feed

Goldfarb v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore Offers Guidance for RCRA Citizen Suits
Summer L. Nastich, September 2, 2015
Plaintiff Bruce Goldfarb sued various current and former owners of property along the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River in Maryland under the citizen suit provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). As noted by the court, RCRA provides cradle to grave governance of all...

A Matter of First Impression: Under the Clean Water Act, What does “Total” Mean?
Ryan C. McKim, September 2, 2015
In American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA, 792 F.3d 281 (2015), a number of trade groups for the agricultural and home building industries (collectively “Plaintiffs”) challenged whether, under the Clean Water Act, the total maximum daily load (“TMDL”) for the Chesapeake Bay...

Court of Appeals Rejects the EPA’s “One Size Fits All” Plan for Cross-State Air Pollution
Christopher G. Foster, September 2, 2015
Under the Clean Air Act (Act), individual states are responsible for ensuring attainment within their states of federal air quality standards. Unfortunately, air pollution is “heedless of state boundaries.” The Act’s “good neighbor” provision speaks to that problem by...


Complete a Client Review

Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.