Home > Neal Roth Lawyer > Offices > Office Profile


Neal H. Roth, Lawyer

  - Office Profile
 





                  Firm Logo for Neal H. Roth Lawyer
Neal H. Roth, Lawyer 
Toronto, Ontario Office
View all offices

401-60 St. Clair Avenue East
Toronto, Ontario  M4T 1N5

(City of Toronto)

Telephone: 416-351-7706
Fax: 416-351-7684
http://www.nealhroth.com



Profile Visibility
#112 in weekly profile views out of 868 law firms in Toronto, Ontario
#27,870 in weekly profile views out of 284,627 total law firms Overall



About this office:

Toronto Litigation - Providing Competent, Realistic and Ethical Legal Services.

Neal is a Toronto Litigation lawyer with over 30 years of experience. He has developed a solid reputation for being both effective and efficient in meeting the requirements of his clients in various practice areas including, Litigation, Collections, Contract Law, Commercial Law, Real Estate Law, Construction Law, Estate Law. He offers excellent services at competitive rates while always maintaining the best interests of his clients.

Your initial meeting and assessment is part of the free initial consultation that is offered by the firm.

Neal offers all clients a personable experience with a clear understanding of your needs every step of the way.

Neal has represented many cases and has listed some significant and landmark cases, as follows:

Counsel in Beals v. Saldanha, [2003] S.C.J. No. 77 - is a leading supreme court of Canada decision on the conflict of laws, where the court established the requirements to enforce foreign judgments in Canada. The court held that foreign judgments were enforceable in Canada where there was a "real and substantial connection" between the foreign jurisdiction and the subject matter giving rise to the claim. This was a landmark case for enforcement of foreign judgments.

Counsel in Heritage Masonry Ltd. V. Building Team Ltd. (1995), 28 C.L.R. (2d) 101 (Ont. Gen. Div.), Ont. Ct., May 27, 1996 Divisional Court Decision which is the landmark case that decided contractors may not deduct their overhead from the trust funds which are payable to their sub-contractors or suppliers.

Counsel in Van Arnhem v. Lornewood Tanning Salon Inc., [1993] O.J. No. 2858, 11 C.L.R. (2d) 54. This is a significant case which determined that an individual will be liable for breach of trust if that individual can control whether funds are advanced to an owner or contractor.



 

Statement of Practice Summary:
Real Estate; Civil Litigation; Business Litigation; Buying And Selling Of Businesses; Collections; Commercial Law; Commercial Litigation; Corporate Litigation; Contracts; Creditors Rights; Debtor And Creditor; Estate Planning; Libel And Slander; Slander; Defamation; Litigation; Mediation; Partnership Law; Residential Real Estate; Construction Liens; Construction Litigation; Legal Malpractice; Torts; Negligence; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Appellate Practice; Breach Of Contract; Business Formation; Business Law; Business Planning; Complex Litigation; Construction Defects; Construction Law; Conveyancing; Corporate Law; Foreclosures; Commercial Leasing.




Year Established: 1982

Languages: English.


Return to the Neal H. Roth, Lawyer Firm Overview


 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add firm to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the firms in your Favorites.