Home > Nexsen Pruet, LLC > Legal Library

Legal Articles: Nexsen Pruet, LLC

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 46


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLThe Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Case against Citibank for Violations Relating to Credit Card Add-On Products
Brooks F. Bossong; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 25, 2015, previously published on August 25, 2015
Today we’re taking a look at the CFPB’s recent enforcement case against Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) and two of Citibank’s subsidiaries, Department Stores National Bank (“DSNB”) and Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.

 

HTMLMaybank on the Government Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 77, Tax Abatement Disclosures
Burnet R. Maybank; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 25, 2015, previously published on August 15, 2015
Today, August 15, 2015, the Government Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 77, Tax Abatement Disclosures.

 

HTMLFourth Circuit Adopts the Joint Employer Test for Title VII Claims
Nexsen Pruet LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 24, 2015, previously published on August 21, 2015
In Butler v. Drive Auto. Indus. of Am., Inc., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (which has jurisdiction over North and South Carolina) joined the majority of federal appellate courts in holding that multiple entities may simultaneously be considered the employers of an employee for purposes of...

 

HTMLThe Uncertain Status of “Stigma Damages” for Property Claims in South Carolina
James W. Potter; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 10, 2015, previously published on August 6, 2015
In Chestnut, et al v. AVX Corporation, Appellate Case 2012-212143 (S.C. Supreme Court August 5, 2014), the State Supreme Court was faced with the issue of whether “stigma damages” could apply for environmental contamination which did not directly impact a plaintiff’s property -...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Expands Religious Discrimination Liability
James A. Byars; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 5, 2015, previously published on July 31, 2015
Most employers know that Title VII prohibits discrimination against applicants or employees based on religion. They also know that Title VII requires employers to provide reasonable, religion-based accommodations to employees who express such a need. But a recent decision of the U.S. Supreme Court...

 

HTMLThe South Carolina Third Party Legal Opinion Report
Laurie A. Becker; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 5, 2015, previously published on August 4, 2015
Lawyers are frequently asked to deliver legal opinions in a variety of business, corporate and commercial transactions to third parties who are not the lawyer¿s client in the transaction.

 

HTMLSouth Carolina Lawmakers Ratify OSHA Requirements
David E. Dubberly; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
July 30, 2015, previously published on July 21, 2015
On June 26, 2015 the South Carolina General Assembly ratified the new OSHA reporting and recordkeeping requirements for SC employers.

 

HTMLDOL Proposes Changes to White Collar Overtime Pay Exemptions
David E. Dubberly; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
July 13, 2015, previously published on July 8, 2015
On July 6, 2015, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) formally proposed revisions to the executive, administrative, and professional (EAP) exemptions to the overtime pay requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act. In addition, the Department requested comments on those proposed revisions and on...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Upholds Affordable Care Act Subsidies
James P. Rourke; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
July 6, 2015, previously published on June 25, 2015
On Thursday June 25, the United States Supreme Court revealed its decision in King v. Burwell.

 

HTMLThe Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's cases against Sprint and Verizon for Mobile Cramming
Brooks F. Bossong; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
July 3, 2015, previously published on June 23, 2015
Today we’re taking a look at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s cases against Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) for mobile cramming. For starters, what does “cramming” mean in the context...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  Next