Home > Nyemaster Goode > Overview


Nyemaster Goode, P.C.

 – Firm Profile
 




Nyemaster Goode, P.C. Law Firm Logo

Nyemaster Goode, P.C. 

Size of Organization: 91
Year Established: 1918
Main Office: Des Moines, Iowa
Web Site: http://www.nyemaster.com

Telephone: 515-283-3100
Fax: 515-283-3108



Profile Visibility
#3,940 in weekly profile views out of 280,906 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm




Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Nyemaster Goode, P.C.:
Labor and Employment (41 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Nyemaster Goode, P.C.: 67


Documents by Nyemaster Goode, P.C. on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Telemed Abortion Case Could Have Broad Implications
Ryan G. Koopmans, April 14, 2015
Tomorrow, the Iowa Supreme Court will hear argument in one of the most closely watched cases of the term: Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Iowa Board of Medicine. The case involves the Board of Medicine’s 2013 rule that bans so-called “telemed abortions,” a process in which...

What Does it Mean When a Justice Concurs “in Result Only”?
Ryan G. Koopmans, April 14, 2015
That’s the question that many lawyers and district court judges will be asking themselves after the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision today in Fagen v. Iddings, where no opinion received a majority of votes and Justice Zager concurred “in result only.”

Traffic Cameras are Constitutional-at Least If You Don’t Deny that You Were Driving
Ryan W. Leemkuil, March 16, 2015
This morning, the Iowa Supreme Court joined a number of courts around the country in rejecting constitutional challenges to a city’s use of traffic cameras (commonly referred to as “automated traffic enforcement,” or “ATE”). The case, City of Sioux City v. Jacobsma,...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.