Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Law Firm Profile > Offices > Office Profile

Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.

  - Office Profile
 





                  Firm Logo for Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier Neustadt L.L.P.
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. 
Alexandria, Virginia Office
View all offices

1940 Duke Street
Alexandria, Virginia  22314
(Independent City)

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Facsimile: 703-413-2220
http://www.oblon.com



Profile Visibility
#2 in weekly profile views out of 405 law firms in Alexandria, Virginia
#778 in weekly profile views out of 203,342 total law firms Overall


Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Unfair Competition
 
               Learn More

 


About this office:

Founded in 1968, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. has grown to become one of the largest full-service firms in the United States specializing exclusively in intellectual property law. The success of the Firm's rapid expansion can be attributed to the founders' passion for quality service. The Firm's staff includes internationally known experts in every field of intellectual property law. Its practice includes federal court litigation, representation at federal agencies, the domestic and international prosecution of patent and trademark applications, copyright registrations, and maskwork applications, as well as necessary support services, including an extensive client education program. The Firm's clientele includes numerous multinational corporations that are among the most active in the intellectual property field, foreign and U.S. government agencies, numerous universities, and businesses of all sizes. Specialties of the firm include, but are not limited to, interference law, chemical/biotech patent law, electrical/mechanical patent law, software patent law, copyright law, and trademark law. Litigation teams work closely with clients to accomplish objectives with dispatch through negotiation, litigation, or alternative dispute resolution. The Firm has conducted and successfully concluded numerous significant re-examinations and reissue procedures, as well as a large number of appeals to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.


 

Statement of Practice Summary:
Patent Law; Patent Prosecution; Patent Litigation; Patent Infringement; Patent Licensing; Patent Protection; Chemical Patents; Biotechnology Patents; Biotechnology Licensing; Biochemical Technology; Genetics; Mechanical Patents; Electrical Patents; Computer and Software Patents; Computer Technology; Software Copyright; Software Leasing; Software Protection; Trademark Law; Trademark Infringement; Trademark Licensing; Trademark Litigation; Trademark Prosecution; Trademark Registration; Copyright Law; Copyright Infringement; Copyright Prosecution; Copyright Registration; Trade Dress; Trade Names; Unfair Competition Law; International Trademarks; International Copyright Law; International Intellectual Property.

Documents by Lawyers at this office

ALJ Charneski Issues Public Version of Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding in Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines (337-TA-641)
Eric W. Schweibenz, November 2, 2009
On October 21, 2009, ALJ Carl C. Charneski issued the public version (dated August 21, 2009) of the Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding ("RD") in Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-641). In the RD, ALJ Charneski recommended (1) that a...

ALJ Gildea Grants In Part Motion for Summary Determination of Importation in Certain Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp ("CCFL") Inverter Circuits (337-TA-666)
Alex Englehart, Eric W. Schweibenz, November 2, 2009
On October 21, 2009, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 31 (dated September 24, 2009) in Certain Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp ("CCFL") Inverter Circuits and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-666). In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted in part Complainants...

Did You Know...The Prevailing Party In A Section 337 Investigation Is Not Automatically A Party On Appeal At The Federal Circuit?
Alex Englehart, Thomas J. Fisher, November 2, 2009
In Section 337 investigations, the party that prevails before the Commission is not entitled to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit the Commission's final determination, and is not automatically a party to an appeal brought by the party that lost before the Commission. ...


Year Established: 1968

Reference:
First Union.



 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Watch List.
 

Add firm to My Watch List

As a registered user of martindale.com you can add firms to your Watch List. You can securely add comments, compare firms in your Watch List, and access these firms with one click from your martindale.com homepage.