Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.

  - Office Profile
 





                  Firm Logo for Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier Neustadt L.L.P.
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier
& Neustadt, L.L.P.
 
Alexandria, Virginia Office
View all offices

1940 Duke Street
Alexandria, Virginia  22314

(Independent City)

Telephone: 703-413-3000
Facsimile: 703-413-2220
http://www.oblon.com



Profile Visibility
#1 in weekly profile views out of 479 law firms in Alexandria, Virginia
#561 in weekly profile views out of 279,115 total law firms Overall


Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Unfair Competition
 
               Learn More

 


About this office:

Founded in 1968, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. has grown to become one of the largest full-service firms in the United States specializing exclusively in intellectual property law. The success of the Firm's rapid expansion can be attributed to the founders' passion for quality service. The Firm's staff includes internationally known experts in every field of intellectual property law. Its practice includes federal court litigation, representation at federal agencies, the domestic and international prosecution of patent and trademark applications, copyright registrations, and maskwork applications, as well as necessary support services, including an extensive client education program. The Firm's clientele includes numerous multinational corporations that are among the most active in the intellectual property field, foreign and U.S. government agencies, numerous universities, and businesses of all sizes. Specialties of the firm include, but are not limited to, interference law, chemical/biotech patent law, electrical/mechanical patent law, software patent law, copyright law, and trademark law. Litigation teams work closely with clients to accomplish objectives with dispatch through negotiation, litigation, or alternative dispute resolution. The Firm has conducted and successfully concluded numerous significant re-examinations and reissue procedures, as well as a large number of appeals to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.



 

Specific Practice & Industry Groups Details:
BiotechnologyChemical Patent Prosecution
CopyrightElectrical Patent Prosecution
ITC LitigationIndustrial Designs
LitigationMechanical Patent Prosecution
Opinions and CounselingPatent Interferences
Patent Pools and StandardsPatent Prosecution
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)Pharmaceutical/Medical Devices
Post Grant Patent ProceedingsTrademark


Statement of Practice Summary:
Patent Law; Patent Prosecution; Patent Litigation; Patent Infringement; Patent Licensing; Patent Protection; Chemical Patents; Biotechnology Patents; Biotechnology Licensing; Biochemical Technology; Genetics; Mechanical Patents; Electrical Patents; Computer and Software Patents; Computer Technology; Software Copyright; Software Leasing; Software Protection; Trademark Law; Trademark Infringement; Trademark Licensing; Trademark Litigation; Trademark Prosecution; Trademark Registration; Copyright Law; Copyright Infringement; Copyright Prosecution; Copyright Registration; Trade Dress; Trade Names; Unfair Competition Law; International Trademarks; International Copyright Law; International Intellectual Property.

Documents by Lawyers at this office
Subscribe to this feed

ALJ Essex Grants Complainants’ Motion To Strike In Certain Wireless Devices With 3G And/Or 4G Capabilities (337-TA-868)
Katherine Cappaert,Eric W. Schweibenz, April 15, 2014
On March 28, 2014, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued the public version of Order No. 111 (dated March 6, 2014) granting Complainants’ Motion to Strike in Certain Wireless Devices With 3G And/Or 4G Capabilities And Components Thereof (Inv. 337-TA-868).

ALJ Gildea Denies Motion To Present Closing Arguments In Certain Integrated Circuit Devices (337-TA-873)
Eric W. Schweibenz, April 15, 2014
On April 3, 2014, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 62 in Certain Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-873).

ALJ Lord Denies Motion To Compel Deposition In Certain Optical Disc Drives (337-TA-897)
Lisa M. Mandrusiak,Eric W. Schweibenz, April 15, 2014
On March 25, 2014, ALJ Dee Lord issued Order No. 42 denying Respondents’ motion to compel Complainant’s employee Ryan Fry for an additional day of deposition and to reimburse fees and costs associated therewith in Certain Optical Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and Products Containing...




Year Established: 1968

Reference:
First Union.



 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add firm to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the firms in your Favorites.