Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. Boston, MA Document Search Results (16)

 

View Page: Prev  1  2  
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLFirst Circuit Dismisses FCA Claim For Failure To Plead Fraud With Particularity And Denies Further Amendments Of Complaint
Andrew E. Silvia; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 2, 2014, previously published on December 23, 2013
On December 6, 2013, in U.S. ex rel. Helen Ge, M.D. v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (No. 13-1088), the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Dr. Helen Ge’s qui tam actions against her former employer, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company (Takeda). Ge claimed that Takeda...

 

HTMLDid An Employer Inflate Its Worker’s Performance Deficiencies as a Pretext for Disability Bias? Mass. Court Says Maybe
Jermaine L. Kidd; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
December 11, 2013, previously published on December 9, 2013
On November 4, 2013, in Akerson v. Pritzker, No. 12-10240-PBS, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts rejected the race discrimination and Equal Pay Act claims brought by a former employee of the U.S. Census Bureau’s, but allowed her Rehabilitation Act claims to proceed to...

 

HTMLA Bit Too Far: Employee’s Alleged Self-Defense Fails To Sway NH Justices On His Wrongful Discharge Claim
Todd M. Torres; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
November 22, 2013, previously published on November 18, 2013
Could an employee be fired by his employer for actions he claimed were done in self-defense? In Leeds v. BAE Systems, No. 2012-599 (November 5, 2013), the New Hampshire Supreme Court found that he could where the employee’s actions went beyond what was reasonably necessary to potentially...

 

HTMLIndependent Contractor or Employee: How Some Countries Differ
Carson G. Burnham, Bonnie Puckett; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
November 7, 2013, previously published on October 27, 2013
In this series of blog posts, we have examined the use of independent-contractor relationships by multinational organizations. In our last three posts, we identified issues for global entities that are considering using independent contractors when expanding their operations overseas, including...

 

HTMLFirst Circuit Affirms Ruling that Employee Who Worked Only 615 Hours in 12 Months Is Not Eligible for FMLA Leave
Andrew E. Silvia; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 25, 2013, previously published on October 23, 2013
On October 9, 2013, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of an employer on claims brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) by a former employee. The court held that the employee was not eligible to take FMLA leave because he had not worked 1,250 hours...

 

HTMLMassachusetts Independent Contractor Law Survives Trade Association’s Challenge
Patrick M. Curran; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
October 11, 2013, previously published on October 8, 2013
The Massachusetts Independent Contractor statute, Mass. G.L. c. 149, § 148B, establishes a rigorous three-part test for determining whether a worker performing services for an employer may be considered an independent contractor, rather than an employee. The U.S. District Court for the...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2