Practice Areas & Industries: Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

 




E-Discovery and Records Retention Return to Practice Areas & Industries

Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

Recognizing that litigation in the 21st Century often focuses on discovery issues – and that advance preparation for discovery is a big step towards winning the battle – Ogletree Deakins offers litigation preparedness and e-discovery advice from a group of seasoned litigators with an eye for detail and years of experience.

Our team helps clients get their corporate houses in order. Working hand in hand with our clients to ensure comprehensive coverage, reliability, accuracy, and workability, we create record retention, litigation hold, record remediation, and e-discovery programs. These programs are critical to the avoidance of the growing threat of spoliation claims, reduce the costs associated with litigation, and help our clients meet regulatory and litigation related record retention obligations – as well as their own business needs for information.

Ogletree Deakins attorneys who have many years experience in addressing discovery issues and managing discovery in complex litigation serve as resources to firm colleagues and clients alike when discovery challenges are presented in litigation. The E-Discovery team provides strategic direction as well as knowledgeable oversight – or can manage the discovery process from start to finish – thus enhancing the effectiveness of the litigators to whom our clients entrust significant disputes.


 
 
Articles Authored by Lawyers at this office:

European Court of Justice Invalidates European Commission’s Safe Harbor Decision
Simon J. McMenemy,Hendrik Muschal,Grant D. Petersen, October 20, 2015
On October 6, 2015, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued its much-anticipated decision in Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, Case C-362/14. The case considered the viability of the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework, which has been applied to permit U.S. companies to transfer personal data...

Second Circuit Refines Title VII Pleading Standard
P. Kramer Rice, September 15, 2015
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently remanded a former employee’s racial discrimination lawsuit brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In Littlejohn v. City of New York, No. 14-1395 (August 3, 2015), the court held that the “plausibility” standard for...

Second Circuit Expands Protections for Internal Whistleblowers
Margaret Hutchins Campbell, September 11, 2015
As we forecast in our August 2015 post, “The SEC’s Interpretative Guidance on Internal Whistleblowing Under the Dodd-Frank Act,” a federal court of appeals today issued a decision in line with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) interpretation that the...

Federal Court Upholds Louisiana Ban on Project Labor Agreements
Andrew P. Burnside, September 01, 2015
A federal court in the Eastern District of Louisiana recently ruled that Louisiana’s ban on project labor agreements on public works projects was neither unconstitutional nor preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). In Southeast Louisiana Building and Construction Trades Council...

Louisiana Federal Court Cautions Against Seeking Enforcement of Invalid Noncompete Agreements
Andrew P. Burnside, September 01, 2015
In what should serve as a cautionary tale to employers with noncompete agreements, a federal court in the Eastern District of Louisiana allowed an unfair trade practices claim to survive against an employer that attempted to enforce an allegedly invalid noncompete agreement.

Louisiana Legislature Ensures Franchisees Are the Sole Employers of Their Workers
Katherine E. Pizzini, September 01, 2015
The Louisiana legislature recently passed Act 404 of the 2015 legislative session, clarifying that in most circumstances franchisees are the sole employers of their employees. The bill was signed by Governor Bobby Jindal on July 1, 2015, and went into effect on August 1, 2015.

Louisiana Supreme Court Reaffirms At-Will Employment Doctrine
Katherine E. Pizzini, September 01, 2015
In Read v. Willwoods Community, 2014-C-1475 (La. 2015), the Supreme Court of Louisiana overturned a jury verdict awarding damages to a plaintiff who claimed that his employer breached a verbal contract to employ him for a term of five years. The plaintiff argued that during his interview the...

Does the “No-Rehire” Provision in Your Settlement Agreement Restrain the Lawful Practice of a Profession?
Daniel J. Kanter, August 20, 2015
When resolving an employment dispute, employers often wish to include a “no-rehire” provision in the settlement agreement. In a typical no-rehire clause, the parties agree that they wish to resolve their dispute and sever any relationship they may have now or in the future. The employee...

Missouri School Boards, Cities, and Counties: Consider Enacting Ordinance Providing for Secret Ballot Union Elections for Certain Employees
Meredith A. Lopez,Robert W. Stewart, August 19, 2015
Article I, Section 29 of the Missouri Constitution gives employees “the right to organize and to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing.” For most public sector employees, Chapter 105 of the Missouri Revised Statutes (RSMo) includes a procedure by which...

Play for Pay? Not Today, Says the Ninth Circuit in the Latest NCAA Ruling
Lisa Karen Atkins,John Richard Carrigan, August 13, 2015
Whether the amateurism rules of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) violate federal antitrust laws remains an active issue before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. But the dramatic changes ordered by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken to take effect for scholarship offers made...

Colorado Supreme Court Affirms Right to Discharge Medical Marijuana User Who Tested Positive in Violation of Zero Tolerance Policy
Raul Chacon,Austin E. Smith, June 19, 2015
Today, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Coats v. Dish Network, No. 13SC394 (June 15, 2015). The court held that Colorado’s lawful off-duty conduct statute does not prohibit employers from discharging employees who choose to use marijuana for medical purposes...

Missouri Supreme Court “Calls an Audible,” Upholds Arbitration Agreement
Andrew L. Metcalf,James M. Paul, June 16, 2015
In recent years, Missouri courts have seemed reluctant to enforce arbitration agreements entered into between employers and employees. But in a recent decision, the Missouri Supreme Court reversed that trend and compelled arbitration of an employee’s age-discrimination claim. The...

New Texas “Open Carry” Legislation On Its Way to Becoming Law
Stephen J. Quezada, June 16, 2015
The Texas House of Representatives recently passed legislation (H.B. 910) that will allow holders of a concealed handgun license to carry holstered handguns in plain view. The Texas Senate passed its version of the “open carry” law (S.B. 17) in April 2015. The bills will proceed to...

Ninth Circuit Extends ERISA Deadline, Revives Untimely Appeal
Sean P. Nalty, June 16, 2015
Last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in LeGras v. AETNA Life Insurance Company, No. 12-56541 (May 28, 2015), holding that the 180-day period to appeal a denial of a long-term disability claim was extended to the following Monday because the last day to submit the appeal...

Retaliation in the Fourth Circuit: Recent Decision Creates New Challenges for Employers
Tevis Marshall, June 16, 2015
In May 2015, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (which has jurisdiction over federal courts in Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina) issued an opinion with negative consequences for employers facing claims of retaliation. In Foster v. University of Maryland-Eastern...

Supreme Court Rules Employer’s Motive (Not Knowledge) Decides Disparate-Treatment Claims
Hera S. Arsen, June 16, 2015
On June 1, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States decided whether an employer’s obligations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are triggered only when an applicant has informed the employer of his or her need for an accommodation of a religious practice. In an 8-to-1...

Automobile Service Advisers Are Not Exempt Under the FLSA—At Least Not According to the Ninth Circuit
Seth E. Ort, May 13, 2015
Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, LLC, No. 13-55323 (March 24, 2015): The plaintiffs in Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, LLC were “service advisors” at a Mercedes Benz dealership. The main duties of service advisors are to evaluate the repair needs of customers’ vehicles and then to...