| Commercial Litigation | Corporate Law |
| Creditors Rights | Environmental Law |
| General Practice | Insurance Defense |
| Intellectual Property Law | Labor and Employment Law |
| Trusts and Estates, Wills and Probate | |
|
|
Learn More |
Founded in 1876, Roetzel & Andress is one of the largest and fastest growing full-service, corporate law firms with eleven offices throughout Ohio, Florida and Washington, D.C. Roetzel & Andress represents a wide range of clients from individuals and closely-held businesses to multi-national corporations, financial institutions, and government entities. Our lawyers serve as general counsel to many clients, and many of those relationships have existed for much of our history. Our lawyers provide a broad range of legal services to clients on a local, national and international basis.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Roetzel & Andress,
A Legal Professional Association:
Toxic Torts (156 cases in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Total number of U.S. granted patents by Roetzel & Andress,
A Legal Professional Association:
32 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Roetzel & Andress,
A Legal Professional Association:
131
Documents by Roetzel & Andress,
A Legal Professional Association on Martindale.com
New Federal Notification Requirements for "Known" Breaches of HIPAA Privacy RegulationsTerence F. Brennan, Anna Moore Carulas, Alan H. Daniels, Michael F. Ruggio, September 17, 2009
Interim final regulations were issued on August 24, 2009 by the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), implementing an amendment made to the HIPAA privacy regulations by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act. These amendments made...
The Sixth Court Expands the use of Differential DiagnosisSeptember 17, 2009
The Sixth Circuit has long been a proponent of differential diagnosis for the establishment of specific causation in toxic tort cases. It recently expanded the application of differential diagnosis to establish general causation in these cases. In doing so, the Sixth Circuit struck an injurious...