- Civil Litigation
- Personal Injury
- Government Construction Contracts
- Insurance Bad Faith
- Complex Business Litigation
- Employment Law
- Surety Law
- Commercial Law
- Appellate Practice
University of California at Los Angeles, A.B., 1965
University of California at Los Angeles, J.D., 1968
Pomona (Chairman, Education of Youth in Law Committee, 1974-1977), Los Angeles County (Member: Barrister's Jail O.R. Committee, 1977-1978; Judicial Evaluation Committee, 1980-1981; Court Improvement Committee, 1980-1981; Distinguished Judge Committee, 1986; Judicial Evaluation Committee, 1988-1992, 1996-2000; Committee on Professionalism, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000; Vice Chairman, Speakers Bureau Committee, 1979-1981; Trustee, 1986-1987, 1988; East District Coordination Committee, 1994-1999) and American (Member: Pretrial Release Committee, Criminal Justice Section, 1977-1978; Committee on CT Problems in High Publicity Cases, 1979-1981) Bar Associations; State Bar of California (Member, Criminal Law and Procedure Committee, 1973-1976); Eastern Bar Association of Los Angeles County (Treasurer, 1978; Secretary, 1979; Vice President, 1980; President, 1981-1982); American Inns of Court (Member, Executive Committee 1994-1995); Boys and Girls Club of Pomona Valley (President, 1973-1976); Founding Member, Board of Directors of the Tom Sherak MS Hope Foundation (2012-current).
Los Angeles, California, September 30, 1942
Moot Court Honors Program. Listed, Southern California Super Lawyer for 2007, Business Litigation, Los Angeles Magazine; National Super Lawyer for 2008, Corporate Counsel Edition, Business Litigation. Member, Board of Trustees, 2005— and Chairman of Board, 2011—, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Southern California Chapter. Member, National and State Moot Court Teams. Trustee, 1973— and Treasurer, 1977—, Pomona Valley Bar Association.
Southwest Concrete Products v. Gosh Construction Corp., 51 Cal.3d 701 (1990); American International Group, Inc. v. Superior Court, 234 Cal.App.3d 749 (1991); Horeczko v. State Board of Registration, 232 Cal.App.3d 1352 (1991); Sutake v. Orange County Federal Credit Union, 186 Cal.App.3d 140 (1986); Conroy v. The Regents of the University of California, 45 Cal. 4th 1244 (2009); Deckert v. County of Riverdale, 115 Cal.App.3d 85 (1981); Span Inc. v. Associated International Insurance Co., 227 Cal.App.3d 463 (1991); Martinez-Ferrer v. Richardson Merrell, Inc., 105 Cal.App.3d 316 (1980); Cornish v. Superior Court, 209 Cal.App.3d (1989); Milo Equipment Corp. v. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, 205 Cal.App.3d 1282 (1988); Capp Care, Inc. v. Superior Ct., 195 Cal.App.3d (1987); Cornelius v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, 49 Cal.App.4th 1761 (1996); In re Imperial Corporation of America; FDIC c. Alshuler, Davidson, Lee & Maniscalco, 92 F.3d 1503 (9th Cir. 1996); Hawkins v. Hawkins 99 Idaho 785, 589 P. 2d 532 (1978); Ryco Construction, Inc. v. United States 55 Fed. Cl. 184, 2002 U.S. Claims Lexis 368 (2002); Brutoco Engineering & Construction, Inc. v Superior Court of the State of California, United Engineering Technology, Inc. and State of California Department of Transportation 107, Cal. App. 4th 1326, (2003); Saeta v. Superior Ct., 117 Cal. App. 4th 261 (2004); Los Alamitos Unified School District v. Howard Contracting Inc. (2014).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com