Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 

Peter Curtin

LinkedIn
Partner
Washington,  DC  U.S.A.
Phone202.344.8187

Peer Rating
 4.4/5.0
BV® Distinguished

Client Rating

Featured BV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured BV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon
Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials Ratings & Reviews
 

Practice Areas
  • ......................... 90%
    Intellectual Propert...
  • ......................... 10%
    Intellectual Propert...
 
University University of Cincinnati, B.A., summa cum laude, 1988 Phi Beta Kappa
 
Law SchoolGeorgetown University Law Center, J.D., magna cum laude, 1991 Order of the Coif
 
Admitted1991, District of Columbia; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
 
BornCincinnati, Ohio, September 18, 1967
 
Biography

Peter Curtin's primary focus is on patent litigation, although he also has experience in Lanham Act cases and various complex general litigation matters. Mr. Curtin has considerable experience in pharmaceutical/ANDA patent litigation, and also has a breadth and depth of experience in cases involving software, telecom, chemical, industrial processes, medical device, mechanical/electrical and business method patents.

Mr. Curtin offers his clients a realistic, thoughtful, and thorough assessment of the strengths and weaknesses in each case and the clients' likelihood of success, including the costs and benefits of litigation. He brings outstanding litigation skills and experience, from writing and legal analysis to trial strategy and courtroom advocacy, as well as a sophisticated understanding of patent law and its interaction with FDA and antitrust law.

Significant Matters

Mr. Curtin has appeared in many federal trial courts. His recent patent cases include representations of a candy manufacturer and a well-known coffee company in disputes over their manufacturing processes, as well as a patentee of income tax software including an automatic download feature. Mr. Curtin has also litigated multiple ANDA cases involving 'block-buster' prescription drugs, and trademark litigation between major technology publishers. He has represented a major medical device manufacturer in patent litigations over cryosurgical and electrosurgical devices and methods, as well as an inter-broker dealer accused of infringing a patent on methods of computerized auctions for securities trading.

Mr. Curtin gained significant criminal trial experience early in his career while serving as a military prosecutor and as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of North Carolina. In those roles he prosecuted cases ranging from first degree murder to drug conspiracy, property crimes, and military offenses.

Activities

Mr. Curtin is the Senior Warden of Grace Episcopal Church, and volunteers for and actively supports a number of charities in the DC metropolitan area.

Industries

Consumer Products and Services

Dietary Supplements, Cosmetics and Functional Foods

Drugs, Medical Devices and Biologics

Life Sciences

Pharmaceuticals

Memberships

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Federal Bar Association

Federal Circuit Bar Association

American Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section

District of Columbia Bar, Intellectual Property Law Section

ABA Section of Litigation, Intellectual Property Litigation Committee, Patent Subcommittee

Licensing Executives Society

News

January 2, 2001, Venable Promotes Eleven to Partner

Honors

Listed in Who's Who in America, 2006-2012

Listed in Who's Who in American Law, 2005-2011

Publications

January 2012, IP Buzz - January 2012
Meaghan Hemmings Kent, Elissa Brockbank Reese, Clifton E. McCann, Janet F. Satterthwaite, Jeffrey D. Knowles, Peter Curtin, Lars H. Genieser, Ph.D., James E. Nelson, Keith G. Haddaway, Ph.D., Marcella Ballard, Justin E. Pierce, Roger A. Colaizzi
IP Buzz

January 11, 2012, Pleading Standards for Inequitable Conduct - Did Therasense Change the Rules?
Peter Curtin

August 5, 2011, A Non-infringing Party Who Had Rejected a License Had Standing to Sue for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Invalidity
Peter Curtin, Yao Wang

Fall 2011, When Is a Sham Not a Sham? The Wellbutrin SR Litigation and the Summary Judgment Standard for Claims of Sham Litigation
Peter Curtin
AIPLA Antitrust Newsletter

November 2010, IP News & Comment - November 2010
Peter Curtin, Todd R. Farnsworth, Clifton E. McCann, Elissa Brockbank Reese
IP Buzz

November 2010, "Patent Misuse Should be Only Narrowly Applied as an Infringement Defense"
William D. Coston, Peter Curtin, Julie A. Petruzzelli, Michael A. Sartori, Ph.D. ABA Section of Litigation

November 2010, The Greatest Generation vs. Generation Y: Barbie® vs. Bratz® -- The Battle Continues
Peter Curtin

September 2010, Federal Circuit En Banc Decision Limits Patent Misuse Defense
William D. Coston, Peter Curtin, Julie A. Petruzzelli, Michael A. Sartori, Ph.D.
Client Alerts

July 2007, "Electronic Discovery: The 800 LB. Gorilla In Your Lap"
Peter Curtin Privacy & Data Security Law Journal

2007, "Securing and Enforcing Patent Rights"
Peter Curtin Patent Litigation and Dispute Resolution (Aspatore Books)

Events/Speaking Engagements

June 20, 2011, "Patent Damages Update: Recent Changes and Related Strategies" for DC Bar
Peter Curtin, Clifton E. McCann

October 29, 2010, Guest Faculty, NACVA Litigation Expert Witness Boot Camp, Washington, DC
Peter Curtin

February 16, 2008, NKU Chase Law Review Symposium
Peter Curtin

October 4, 2002, "Litigating Biotech Patent Cases" at the conference "Dealing in Life and Drugs: Contemporary Issues in the Business of Biotechnology," sponsored by the TECHLAW Group
Peter Curtin

 
ISLN900536401
 

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Pleading Standards for Inequitable Conduct - Did Therasense Change the Rules
Peter Curtin, January 12, 2012
In its recent Therasense opinion, the Federal Circuit “tightened the standards for finding both intent and materiality in order to redirect a doctrine that has been overused to the detriment of the public,” because “the inequitable conduct doctrine has plagued not only the courts...


View Ratings & Reviews
Profile Visibility
#1,824 in weekly profile views out of 47,588 lawyers in Washington, District of Columbia
#62,278 in weekly profile views out of 1,447,639 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Peter Curtin
Venable LLP
575 7th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004




Loading...
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now