Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

Mr. P. Adam Davis

Managing Member
Davis & Sarbinoff, LLCBusiness Attorneys & Counsellors at Law
9000 Keystone Crossing, Suite 660
Indianapolis, Indiana 46240
Peer Rating
3.7 of 5.0
Client Rating
5.0 of 5.0
Peer Reviewed
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Business Law; Formation; Development; Franchise Law; Compliance; Franchising; Mergers & Acquisitions; Buying & Selling; Trademark Law; Licensing; Copyrights; Business Litigation; Franchise Litigation
University
Indiana University, Bloomington, B.A.
Law School
Indiana University School of Law - Bloomington, J.D., 2001
Admitted
Indiana; Hawaii; U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana; U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; U.S. Supreme Court
ISLN
917785090
Peer Reviews (14)
Peer Reviewed
3.7/5.0
Peer Rating
 
Civil Litigation, Retail Collections, Business Law, Closely Held Business Law, Bankruptcy, General Practice, Real Property Development and Creditors Rights
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
3.7/5
Analytical Capabilities
3.9/5
Judgment
3.4/5
Communication Ability
3.9/5
Legal Experience
3.8/5
Peer Reviews (14)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 02/18/14
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Excellent lawyer
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Principal on 02/18/14
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Excellent lawyer....deserves an AV rating
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 05/14/12
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 02/18/14
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.4/5.0 Posted by a Member on 04/24/12
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Adam is an up and coming business lawyer who has had some intereting cases in his young career. He's as good if not better than his colleagues in the large Indianapolis firms. Those lawyers are rated AV. Hence, there is no reason why Adam too should be rated any less than AV.
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.2/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 05/02/12
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 02/26/14
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 05/10/12
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.2/5.0 Posted by a Sole Practitioner on 05/14/12
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
3/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
3/5
3.0/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 03/22/10
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
2/5
Communication Ability
2/5
Legal Experience
3/5
2.8/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 03/29/10
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
I was concerned when he served on a homeowner's associaiton board of director while he represented a real estate developer without obtaining a confict waiver and without fully disclosing his potetial conficts to the Board of Directors.
Legal Knowledge
2/5
Analytical Capabilities
2/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
3/5
2.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 03/22/10
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
3/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
2/5
Communication Ability
3/5
Legal Experience
3/5
2.4/5.0 Posted by a Associate on 05/02/12
Legal Knowledge
2/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
2/5
Communication Ability
2/5
Legal Experience
3/5
1.8/5.0 Posted by a Managing Partner on 11/16/12
He is difficult to deal with and is not one that I would trust with him keeping his word.
Legal Knowledge
2/5
Analytical Capabilities
2/5
Judgment
1/5
Communication Ability
2/5
Legal Experience
2/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Client Reviews

Overall Client Rating

in Business Law, Contracts and Intellectual Property
5.0 out of 5.0
Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Client(s)
  • Last reviewed on 05/07/12
Posted by a Small Business on 05/07/12
Mr. Davis is a very knowledgeable attorney and knows how to get whatever I need done quickly. He handles all of our legal issues and advises our company on all legal matters. I have thoroughly enjoyed working with him and look forward to future dealings.
Posted by a Small Business on 05/07/12
Exceptional service from Mr. Davis and his staff! He has been a wealth of knowledge when forming partnerships and making big decisions regarding the future of the company.
Posted by a Corporation on 03/27/12
5.0 out of 5.0  
Honestly, I have never met an attorney that was so easy to work with and worked with me as a member of a team.
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.